Park Place

Cars

Cars parked along State Street in downtown Harrisburg.

Not infrequently, a Harrisburg resident comes up to the public microphone during a City Council meeting and complains about–you guessed it–parking.

You read the same types of things in the comment section of PennLive or hear them just by talking with someone on the street or in a bar. Too expensive, aggressive enforcement, not friendly, no room for error.

And, every time, I think to myself: “Haven’t these people been paying attention?”

The deal is done, the cake baked, the horse outta the barn. The mayor and council can’t do anything because the city, drowning in red ink, signed off on an insanely complicated deal that privatized the parking system to pay off a big chunk of its overwhelming debt.

Game over. Get used to it.

And then, it turned out, I was wrong.

Over the past week, Mayor Eric Papenfuse announced a series of changes to the parking system that required creativity, boldness and no small measure of salesmanship.

It meant intervening in an area where he had no real power or authority. It required believing that, despite abundant evidence to the contrary, obstinate, invisible Park Harrisburg might be open to change–change it contractually did not have to make. It mandated putting together a series of improvements to the parking system, finding the money to fund some of them, and selling the package to all the parties (the operator, the manager, the state, City Council, Pango).

The cynics might look at the result and see small potatoes. Starting April 1, the “happy hour” rate from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. will be reduced by $1 per hour. Motorists can park for free for four hours on Saturday but only if they use the Pango mobile app. Beginning in May, they can park during lunchtime for just $3 total, but must use the River Street garage. Park Harrisburg has promised a five-minute grace period before issuing tickets and says its enforcement officers will be retrained as “ambassadors” who will engage the public, not alienate it.

To cover any lost revenue to Park Harrisburg, Papenfuse has pledged $285,000 in “hotel tax” funds left over from last year, money earmarked for marketing the city. He believes that getting more people downtown is a good use of the city’s marketing dollars.

I agree.

For the past year, Harrisburg has found itself the victim of what I would call an anti-marketing campaign. People have been put off by aggressive enforcement, pricey tickets and a distant, uncaring operator. Local media have piled on, so that, day after day, week after week, people have heard a single message: Stay out of Harrisburg!

Papenfuse’s actions helped change the tenor of the conversation. Sure, some people will always regard free parking as a birthright. Others, however, may believe that it’s worth a couple of bucks after work to get easy, walkable access from McGrath’s to Stock’s, from Cafe Fresco to Federal Taphouse, from Cork & Fork to Suba–among a dozen other places downtown. These are the people who are reachable, who might be lured back by a little good news, by a cheaper rate, by a few free hours on Saturday.

Is there a risk for Harrisburg? Yes. Papenfuse’s move is a gamble, though, like a good gambler, he has limited his downside. The city can’t lose more than the $285,000 in hotel tax funds, money that, by design, is intended to bring outsiders in. And that’s a worst-case scenario. Assuming some people respond positively to the changes, the city might lose far less, maybe nothing.

Meanwhile, Papenfuse has maximized his upside. He’s out to prove to Park Harrisburg that lower rates will actually increase their business and boost their revenues. If he’s right, the parking operator may see the value in lower rates permanently, and downtown businesses may recover lost customers. Meanwhile, unlike most marketing campaigns, the results will be directly measurable and some, perhaps all, of the money may remain unspent, available for another initiative down the road.

Papenfuse has proven himself to be a creative problem-solver. He took something most people (myself included) thought was done, over, cooked. He revived it, sold it to multiple parties, and, starting Wednesday, parkers, businesses and the city will be the beneficiaries.

In the past, I’ve poked some fun at the mayor for his boundless enthusiasm. This achievement, though, is something he has every right to be excited about.

Continue Reading

After Challenge, Candidate Seeks to Unmask His True Rival

Every election season, the challenges appear, picking out every conceivable error on political candidates’ paperwork—some glaring, some subtle—in an attempt to knock them off the ballot before a vote even occurs.

It’s not always evident who’s behind the challenges. But in court Friday morning, Alan Kennedy-Shaffer, a Democratic candidate for Harrisburg City Council, named who he believed was behind his: James Pianka, a long-time operator in city politics, though one who usually works behind the scenes.

Two petitioners sought to strike the nomination of Kennedy-Shaffer on claims that he notarized a portion of his own paperwork. One, by David Smith, of the 2600-block of Lexington Street, has since been withdrawn. The other, by Jan Prosseda, of the 2800-block of N. 2nd Street, was heard at Friday morning’s hearing.

Kennedy-Shaffer notarized the signatures of the people who circulated petitions on his behalf, allegedly a violation of state notary law, the challengers claimed.

There is nothing on the surface of either court challenge to indicate any connection to Pianka. Pianka, asked about the Prosseda challenge Thursday afternoon, distanced himself from it, though he would not explicitly deny involvement.

“Is my name on it?” he said, referring to the civil complaint, as he left a meeting at an office building uptown.

When Pianka was asked for an explicit denial, his son, James Matthew Pianka, who was with him, repeated his father’s question. “Is his name on it?” he said, as they walked towards their car.

But there are plenty of indications that the man whose name actually appears on the challenge isn’t behind it, either.

Reached by phone Thursday, Prosseda said he filed the petition “as a favor” for someone whose name he declined to mention.

Prosseda also said he was unaware of the scheduled hearing and did not appear in court Friday.

Timothy Brennan, Prosseda’s attorney, said he could not discuss conversations with his client. Asked about Pianka’s involvement, Brennan gave no comment, indicating only that Prosseda’s name was the one on the challenge.

Kennedy-Shaffer, an attorney and an employee at the state Department of Corrections, is one of 12 candidates who have thrown their hats in the ring for the four council seats up for grabs in this year’s election.

He believes Pianka filed the challenge in retaliation after the Dauphin County Democrats opted not to endorse any candidates in the council race.

Kennedy-Shaffer moved for an open primary at the committee’s March 14 meeting, cutting off an effort by Pianka to secure an endorsement for Brad Koplinski, Kennedy-Shaffer said.

Both Pianka and his son have circulated petitions for Koplinski, a current council member who failed in a recent bid for lieutenant governor.

But Alex Reber, the committee’s vice-chair, said he doubted the petition challenge had anything to do with the vote for an open primary, pointing out the committee has been opting not to endorse candidates in most city races for the past several years.

“I don’t think it was retaliation,” he said. “We’re happy there’s an open primary. We think it’s good for democracy.”

Of the 40 or so members from Harrisburg in attendance on March 14, two-thirds voted in favor of an open primary, said Rogette Harris, the committee chairwoman.

In Friday’s court hearing, before Judge Scott Evans, Kennedy-Shaffer’s attorney did not dispute that his client had notarized the petitions under question. He argued, however, that doing so was not a violation of the election code, and even if it was, it was an “amendable” error that should not result in removal from the ballot.

Brennan, representing Prosseda, argued to the contrary that Kennedy-Shaffer’s action showed “purposeful indifference” to what he should have known was a potential violation of the law.

As part of his case, Brennan brought testimony from Gerald Feaser, director of the county elections bureau, who said he had given general, non-legal advice to Kennedy-Shaffer and other potential candidates at a Feb. 9 informational meeting.

Feaser also had told Kennedy-Shaffer that notarizing his own paperwork was something he “wouldn’t advise,” Feaser testified, though he added that he was not an attorney and that he viewed his comments as “public relations” and not as legal advice.

Evans’ decision is not expected until next week, as Ron Clever, Kennedy-Shaffer’s attorney, got the judge’s permission to file a legal brief Monday morning.

In the meantime, whether or not he defeats his challengers in court, Kennedy-Shaffer has sought at least to unmask them.

“I’ve got a target on my back from Mr. Pianka and Mr. Koplinski,” Kennedy-Shaffer said during testimony.

Koplinski did not return multiple calls seeking comment.

This story has been updated with comments from Alex Reber, vice-chair of the Dauphin County Democratic Committee.

Continue Reading

Parking Play: The mayor’s quarter-million-dollar bet on downtown parking.

Mayor Eric Papenfuse, holding scissors, at a ribbon-cutting for Pango mobile parking app last year.

Mayor Eric Papenfuse, holding scissors, at a ribbon-cutting for the Pango mobile parking app last year.

Harrisburg motorists are about to be part of Mayor Eric Papenfuse’s grand parking gamble.

The wager? That reduced happy hour prices and free parking on Saturdays will draw more parkers downtown, offsetting the damage to local businesses from a rate hike that began last year.

The stakes? About $285,000 in public money.

That’s the amount the city will pledge, pending a City Council vote Wednesday night, to make up for lost revenues in the event reduced prices don’t attract more drivers.

“We’re going to experiment with a theory we have…which says that basically, if we lower rates, then maybe more people will come to park,” Papenfuse said. “And we certainly believe that that will hopefully be the case.”

The money for the experiment will be allocated from a city account holding unspent county hotel tax dollars from 2014. Hotel taxes, which come from a countywide 5-percent levy on overnight lodging, are split between the county, the city and the tourism bureau for the purpose of promoting regional tourism.

If council agrees to the allocation, happy hour parking prices, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. on weekdays, will be lowered from $3 to $2 per hour beginning April 1.

Additionally, drivers will be able to get four free hours of parking on Saturdays by using the promotional code “LUVHBG” on a mobile parking app, beginning April 4.

The city will sponsor the free hours for drivers using the Pango app, which allows people to purchase and renew parking remotely by phone for a small fee.

For drivers using the “LUVHBG” code, which can also be entered as the number 588424, Pango will waive the fee as well as validate the four hours of parking, making the hours “truly free,” Papenfuse said.

Papenfuse discussed the proposal at a press conference Wednesday morning in city hall, where he described the changes as a response to customer complaints about increased rates and longer hours.

“Why are we doing this? Because we have listened,” Papenfuse said.

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, the parking system’s new manager under a long-term lease signed in 2013, also announced several initiatives on Wednesday to improve customer experience and attract more parkers.

One is a “rebranding” of parking officers as “ambassadors,” under a program that Standard Parking, the parking operator under the lease, has employed in other cities.

The “ambassadors” will be specially trained with knowledge of city events and locations, will wear “Ask Me” buttons to encourage the public to approach them, and will carry city maps and other informational material for handing out to visitors.

The operators also plan to implement a five-minute grace period before officers will ticket a car whose time has expired. The grace period is currently being tested and should take effect in the next two weeks, said John Gass, a director at Trimont.

A third program is a lunchtime discount program at the River Street garage, where weekday drivers will be able to pay $3 for up to two hours of parking, as long as they enter the garage after 11:30 a.m. and leave by 1:30 p.m.

On weekends, the program will allow drivers to pay $3 for up to four hours of parking, as long as they enter after 11 a.m. and leave by 3 p.m.

The lunchtime pricing reflects a steep discount on usual rates, which at the River Street garage are normally $8 for two hours and $12 for four hours.

The program is planned to take effect by May, pending the installation of new automated exits and entrances.

The initiatives, which are the first of several to be implemented in the coming years, should help show the parking system is “responsive to public comments,” Gass said.

Harrisburg leased its parking system in late 2013 as part of a state-sponsored plan to pull city finances from the brink of bankruptcy.

The system saw worse-than-expected returns its first year, in part because a long winter led to delays in installing new meters. The fourth quarter saw a shortfall in projected revenues of about $750,000, according to unaudited 2014 financials.

The approved 2015 budget projects $22.5 million in total revenues, with a tiny surplus, around $75,000, left over after all expenses.

Partly for that reason, the city had to put up money to guarantee that any rate changes would not hurt revenues. Nonetheless, Papenfuse said Wednesday he was confident the lower rates would attract enough drivers to cover the city’s wager.

The $285,000 figure represents the city’s “total exposure,” he said, reflecting how much revenue the system would lose if the lower rates attracted no new drivers.

Gass agreed. “We think we have very conservative assumptions at this point,” he said. “The $285,000 is truly a worst-case number.”

Continue Reading

Council Candidate Kennedy-Shaffer Faces Petition Challenge

Alan Kennedy-Shaffer, left, with former Harrisburg receiver David Unkovic at a Harrisburg Hope forum at the Midtown Scholar Bookstore in 2011.

Alan Kennedy-Shaffer, left, with former Harrisburg receiver David Unkovic at a Harrisburg Hope forum at the Midtown Scholar Bookstore in 2011.

Harrisburg City Council candidate Alan Kennedy-Shaffer faces two challenges to his bid for office that, if successful, would strike him from the ballot in the May Democratic party primary.

The challengers filed their complaints with the Dauphin County court this week, alleging that Kennedy-Shaffer, a notary public, improperly certified his nominating petitions with his own notarial seal.

The challengers are David L. Smith, of the 2600-block of Lexington Street, and Jan Prosseda, of the 2800-block of N. 2nd Street, both registered Democrats, according to court filings.

Candidate nominating petitions contain a section in which the person circulating the petition must attest to its legitimacy in the presence of a notary.

In their complaints, Smith and Prosseda claim that Kennedy-Shaffer acted as the notary on the affidavits for 11 of the 12 petitions he filed to get on the ballot.

Doing so, they allege, was a violation of state law, which states that a notary public cannot act in an official capacity on transactions in which he or she is “directly or pecuniarily interested.”

The challenged petitions contain a total of 243 signatures. A twelfth petition, which was stamped by a notary other than Kennedy-Shaffer, contains an additional six signatures. A candidate needs 100 signatures to get on the ballot.

Destini Hodges, a running mate of Kennedy-Shaffer’s, circulated some of the challenged petitions, as did Stanley Gruen, who recently applied unsuccessfully with Kennedy-Shaffer for a zoning variance to open a distillery in Midtown.

In a separate section of the petitions, called a “candidate’s affidavit,” Kennedy-Shaffer did obtain the seal of an independent notary.

A hearing on the petition challenges has been scheduled for Friday, March 27 before Judge Scott A. Evans.

Reached late Friday, Kennedy-Shaffer said he had not yet received copies of the challenges, but that he was aware of them and “optimistic Judge Evans will let the voters decide who will best represent them on City Council.”

Kennedy-Shaffer, an attorney and a former employee at the state Liquor Control Board, is one of 12 Democratic candidates running for City Council in this year’s primary.

He is the founder of Harrisburg Hope, a grassroots political organization that has hosted candidates’ nights, debates and other public events since early 2011. In 2014, he failed in a bid for chairman of the Dauphin County Democratic Committee.

The primary election is scheduled for May 19.

Continue Reading

TheBurg Podcast, March 20, 2015

Welcome to TheBurg Podcast, a weekly roundup of news in and around Harrisburg.

March 20, 2015: This week, Larry and Paul talk about the faintest glimpse of a conclusion to the grand jury probe into the city’s incinerator debt fiasco, a challenge to a City Council candidate’s run for office, a bid for a blighted Midtown building and council’s eyes for independent legal advice.

Special thanks to Paul Cooley, who wrote our theme. You can find his podcast, the PRC Show, on SoundCloud and in the iTunes store.

TheBurg Podcast can be downloaded by clicking on the date above or by visiting the iTunes store. You can also access the podcast via its host page, here.

Continue Reading

Mixed Use Proposed for Historic Moose Lodge

 

WCI Partners may be interested in converting the historic Moose Lodge into a mixed use project.

WCI Partners may be interested in restoring and repurposing the historic Moose Lodge in Midtown Harrisburg.

WCI Partners is eyeing the former Ronald H. Brown Charter School site, which it would like to restore and convert to a mix of commercial and residential space.

WCI President David Butcher confirmed that the Harrisburg-based developer is interested in the property, but would offer few additional details, saying that a plan had not been finalized.

“We are looking at a potential mixed-use project there and are currently doing our due diligence,” said Butcher.

The property consists of four individual parcels along the 900-block of N. 3rd Street. It includes the 38,000-square-foot Moose Temple lodge at the corner of N. 3rd and Boas streets and three much smaller, dilapidated townhouses. According to a legal notice in PennLive, the sales price is $900,000.

For-profit charter school company Mosaica Education bought the property group in 2000 for $6.6 million, contracting with Ronald Brown to run the school. The buildings have been empty since 2005, after the Harrisburg school district’s Board of Control refused to reauthorize Ronald Brown’s five-year charter.

In 2010, local businessman Phil Dobson bought the properties at judicial tax sale for $188,000, flipping them back to Mosaica a few months later for $320,000.

The property group originally included the old Boas School at the corner of Forster and Boas streets. That parcel was sold in 2009 and now houses an executive-style apartment building.

In October 2014, a federal judge placed Atlanta-based Mosaica in receivership after the company defaulted on $20 million in debt. The receiver is now disposing of some of Mosaica’s real estate holdings in an attempt to turn around the ailing chain of charter schools.

A hearing on whether to approve the sale of the properties to WCI is slated for March 25 in U.S. District Court in Atlanta.

The Harrisburg Moose Temple lodge was built in 1924, designed in the Beaux Arts style by renowned Harrisburg architect Clayton J. Lappley.

Disclosure: Alex Hartzler, publisher of TheBurg, is a principal with WCI Partners LP.

Continue Reading

Kane: Incinerator Probe Hoped To End Soon

Former Harrisburg Mayor Steve Reed, left, and former Harrisburg Authority board member Fred Clark at a Senate hearing on the incinerator financings in 2012.

Former Harrisburg Mayor Steve Reed, left, and former Harrisburg Authority board member Fred Clark at a Senate hearing on the incinerator financings in 2012.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane briefly addressed the progress of the probe into Harrisburg’s incinerator financings Tuesday morning, saying her office hoped to bring the case to a conclusion “in the very near future.”

The remarks came at a budget hearing before the Senate appropriations committee in response to a question by Sen. Rob Teplitz, D-Dauphin, whose district includes Harrisburg.

Teplitz brought up the investigation as a prelude to a question about funding for a military and veterans affairs division in Kane’s office.

It was critical to his constituents, Teplitz said, to find out “whether that debacle was the result of criminal activity on the one hand or just bad government or bad lawyering on the other hand.”

In response, Kane said she understood the importance of coming to a conclusion, adding that “dedicated agents” had been working on the investigation “since its inception.”

“All people want is the truth,” she said. “We’re hoping to draw to a conclusion in the very near future. And we understand that no stone will be left unturned.”

Teplitz is also the Democratic chair of the Senate local government committee, which held hearings on the incinerator financings in the fall of 2012.

Those hearings sought to shed light on how a series of borrowings in the mid-2000s related to a retrofit of the city’s trash-burning facility had ballooned to a more than $350 million debt that pushed the capital nearly to bankruptcy.

A host of witnesses testified, including Harrisburg’s first receiver David Unkovic, former Mayor Stephen Reed, future Mayor Eric Papenfuse and a number of past board members from the municipal authority that approved the borrowings.

Continue Reading

TheBurg Podcast, March 13, 2015

Welcome to TheBurg Podcast, a weekly roundup of news in and around Harrisburg.

March 13, 2015: This week, Larry and Paul talk about Gov. Wolf’s proposed state budget and its possible pluses for Harrisburg, the incremental movements in the lawsuits over the city’s gun laws, and the fateful decade when Harrisburg city government went into the hotel business.

Special thanks to Paul Cooley, who wrote our theme. You can listen to Paul’s own podcast, the PRC Show, on SoundCloud or in the iTunes store.

TheBurg Podcast can be downloaded by clicking on the date above or by visiting the iTunes store. You can also access the podcast via its host page, here.

Continue Reading

TheBurg Podcast, March 6, 2015

Welcome to TheBurg Podcast, a weekly roundup of news in and around Harrisburg.

March 6, 2015: This week, Larry and Paul talk about Gov. Wolf’s proposed state budget and its possible pluses for Harrisburg, the incremental movements in the lawsuits over the city’s gun laws, and the fateful decade when Harrisburg city government went into the hotel business.

Special thanks to Paul Cooley, who wrote our theme. You can listen to Paul’s own podcast, the PRC Show, on SoundCloud or in the iTunes store.

TheBurg Podcast can be downloaded by clicking on the date above or by visiting the iTunes store. You can also access the podcast via its host page, here.

Continue Reading

Harrisburg School Property Taxes Eliminated under Wolf Plan

SchoolSpreadsheet

A page from the school funding spreadsheet distributed today by Gov. Tom Wolf’s office. In order, the final three columns represent the total proposed property tax reduction allocation for the 2015-16 school year; the 2012-13 residential real estate tax collected; and the percentage of proposed residential real estate tax reduction for the 2015-16 school year.

Harrisburg residents would see their school property taxes zeroed out if a bold plan proposed today by Gov. Tom Wolf passes the state legislature.

Wolf’s proposed 2016 budget would dramatically change how schools would be funded, as increased income and sales taxes would provide much of the money for public schools. As a result, residential school property taxes in many of the state’s poorer districts would be eliminated, while wealthier districts also would see a reduction.

In Harrisburg, residents would pay no school property tax at all. Even non-resident homeowners would have their taxes reduced under Wolf’s proposed budget.

To pay for his plan, Wolf would raise the state’s income tax to 3.7 percent from 3.07 percent and the sales tax to 6.6 percent from 6 percent. The proposal was a key part of the $29.9 billion spending plan for 2016 that Wolf unveiled today.

“This is quite an exciting day,” said Harrisburg Mayor Eric Papenfuse. “If you take school property taxes to zero for Harrisburg, you’ll see people flocking in to buy properties in the city.”

Papenfuse said he wasn’t sure of the odds of Wolf’s plan being passed, but hoped it would not be summarily rejected by the Republican-controlled legislature.

“He’s building on a Republican House proposal to do something similar,” Papenfuse said.

Wolf’s proposal would not eliminate school property taxes for most suburban jurisdictions, but would substantially lower them.

For instance, the school property tax for Camp Hill residents would fall by about one-third, with a similar decrease for homeowners residing in the Central Dauphin School District.

Historically, property taxes have provided the bulk of school funding in the United States. In recent years, however, some states have begun to look to other ways of funding schools so that the burden is shared more equally among all taxpayers, not just property owners.

 

 

Continue Reading