Proposed Convenience Store Gets First OK

CornerStoreFB

The Harrisburg Planning Commission tonight gave unanimous approval to a planned convenience store at the corner of Green and Kelker streets.

By a 4-0 vote, the commission recommended that a special exception be granted to allow a convenience store to operate at the site and to waive the four-vehicle off-street parking requirement. The commission only mandated that the property pass a health inspection and follow city-mandated rules for signage. Commission members also recommended that a trash receptacle be located outside the store, which is slated to operate from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. daily.

Otherwise, the commission asked few questions of the applicant, Mohamed Ahmed Ahrar, or of the representative of property owner Michael Goldberg Properties. Despite some opposition in the Olde Uptown neighborhood to the proposal, not a single member of the public attended the meeting.

The commission did read a letter in opposition submitted by Historic Harrisburg Association, which claimed the proposed store was incompatible with the neighborhood, but quickly dismissed the reasoning.

The commission’s recommendation now goes to the city’s Zoning Hearing Board, which will meet on Monday to consider the application. The board has the final say over whether to grant the special exception. 

The century-old property at 224 Kelker St. most recently housed a barbershop, though, over the years, has served many uses, including as a corner store, a drugstore and a tea shop.

Continue Reading

Firefighters Agree to Cuts, Health Care Cost Sharing Under New Labor Contract

Photo credit: Brian Bastinelli, BrianBastinelli.com.

Photo credit: Brian Bastinelli, BrianBastinelli.com.

The Harrisburg chapter of the International Association of Firefighters has agreed to a new labor agreement, Mayor Eric Papenfuse announced on Tuesday. The agreement, which the union approved by a 38 to 15 vote, includes reductions in scheduled salary increases, an increase in employee health care contributions and salary cuts for new hires. It also represents the final concession from the city’s labor unions required as part of the state-appointed receiver’s recovery plan.

“I think the important thing to note here today is that a tremendous number of sacrifices are being made by the members of the firefighters’ union in an effort to allow this city to move forward,” Papenfuse said. In meetings with the firefighters, he said, he had tried to convey that, without contract modifications, “the budget would not be balanced and the city would stay mired in the financial difficulties that had gotten us first into Act 47 and then into receivership.”

The mayor’s proposed budget for 2014 already included the expected savings under the new agreement, projected to be around $1.6 million, or around $20,000 for each of the 79 bargaining-unit positions in the fire department. This figure is somewhat misleading, however, as the direct effect on an individual firefighter depends on his or her time of hire, family size and consumption of health care.

Some of the savings are achieved through the elimination of scheduled pay raises, previously set under a contract extension signed by former Mayor Stephen Reed. The raises, which had been set at 3 percent per year beginning in 2013, will be zeroed out in 2013 and 2014 and replaced with a 1-percent raise in 2015.

A sizeable portion of the projected savings—around $485,000 per year, according to Susan B. Friedman, a lawyer for the receiver—will come from a change in firefighters’ health care plans. Formerly, the majority of firefighters contributed nothing to the cost of coverage beyond their co-pays. Under the new agreement, their health care plans will now include partial contributions from each paycheck, at a rate of $40 for individuals and $90 for family care, as well as deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums and a change in co-payments for prescriptions.

The largest chunk of the savings, around $520,000, is expected to come from a reduction in numbers manning each shift, from 16 to 14 firefighters.

On Tuesday, Mayor Papenfuse attributed the union vote, in part, to a pair of “behind-closed-doors meetings” he held with firefighters in January, during which he tried to restore trust between the city and its public safety personnel. “We met right where they sleep, right inside their quarters,” he said. “I extended a hand of partnership, of trust, and I am pleased to say I was met with a hand from the other side.”

Glenn Sattizahn, the local union president, also acknowledged the mayor’s role in bringing the new agreement to a vote. “The turning point, I would venture to say, was after the meetings with the mayor,” Sattizahn said. “He’s quite persuasive.”

But, Sattizahn added, continued pressure from the receiver’s office, which could eventually compel the firefighters to comply through the courts, also played a role. “There wasn’t really a whole lot of compromise,” he said. “We were, for the most part, forced into this.”

Continue Reading

Harrisburg Declares Snow Emergency

Harrisburg Mayor Eric Papenfuse today declared a snow emergency for the city, beginning at midnight and requiring the removal of all vehicles from snow emergency routes. The full text of his statement is below.

MAYOR ERIC PAPENFUSE DECLARES SNOW EMERGENCY EFFECTIVE MIDNIGHT TONIGHT

HARRISBURG – Mayor Eric Papenfuse is declaring a snow emergency effective midnight tonight, requiring city residents to move their cars from emergency snow routes.

By special arrangement with Standard Parking, residents can park without charge at the Locust Street Garage. Free parking is also available on City Island, the Fire Museum at 1824 N. 4th St., and at the Farm Show Complex (Maclay Street side near Front Entrance).

Through special arrangement with the Capital Area Transit (CAT), shuttle service from the Locust Street Garage, City Island and the Farm Show, will be extended until 8 p.m. Wednesday. The shuttles will resume at 6:45 a.m. Thursday, if weather permits.

Mayor Papenfuse is also urging people to voluntarily move cars parked on Penn, Allison and Zarker Streets to facilitate plowing, salting and access by emergency vehicles.

The National Weather Service is warning the winter storm could dump an estimated 8-12 inches of snow on the region.

To qualify for free parking in the Locust Street Garage, drivers will need proper ID or documentation.  Residents may enter the garage from 4-10 p.m. Wednesday, Feb.12, 2014 or from 8 a.m.-7 p.m.  Thursday, Feb.13, 2014 to qualify for free parking.

To gain access to the garage, residents will pull a ticket at the entrance.  To exit residents will need to show a driver’s license with a Harrisburg address or proof of residency.  

To help accommodate residents, garage hours have been extended three hours – to 10 p.m. on Wednesday, Feb. 12.  After 10 p.m. vehicles in the garage will not be accessible until 8 a.m. Thursday, Feb. 13.  The garage will then remain open and accessible to everyone until 7 p.m. Thursday.

Unless further notice is given, all residents will need to exit the Locust Street Garage by 6:30 a.m. Friday, Feb. 14 to avoid being charged for parking in the garage during this period. Residents wishing to park their cars after 10 p.m. Wednesday should chose City Island, the Fire Museum or the Farm Show. Cars must be removed from the Farm Show parking lot by 6:30 a.m. Friday.

If poor conditions persist, free parking times may be extended.  Please monitor www.parkharrisburg.com. www.harrisburgpa.gov  or local media for communication of extended time.

SNOW EMERGENCY ROUTES INCLUDE:

·         Division Street – Front Street to 7th

·         Second Street – Paxton St. to Division St

·         Maclay Street- Front to 7th St.

·         Seventh Street – Division to Fisher Plaza St.  (Fisher Plaza is between Forster and Walnut Streets at the Capitol Complex, to the immediate east of the Main Capitol Building. The city has no responsibility for streets within the Capitol Complex)

·         Walnut Street – Fisher Plaza to Front St.

·         Paxton Street – Cameron to City/Swatara Township line

·         Derry Street- Mulberry Street Bridge to City/Paxtang Line

·         Market Street – Cameron Street  to 25th St.

·         State Street – Fisher Plaza to City/Susquehanna Twp. Line

·         Herr Street – Cameron Street to city/Susquehanna Twp. Line

·         Seventeenth Street – Sycamore Street to Arsenal Boulevard

 On Thursday, Standard Parking will restrict their ticketing to cars parked on Snow Emergency Routes.  The Mayor will hold a press briefing at noon Thursday to update the public on weather conditions. City Hall will remain open during the Snow Emergency, but city employees are being allowed liberal leave.

 For more information, contact Joyce M. Davis at [email protected]; or call (717) 255-3015.

 

Continue Reading

Old Business

Susan Brown-Wilson, foreground, and other members of City Council at council's legislative session, Tuesday, Feb. 11.

Susan Brown-Wilson, foreground, and other members of City Council at council’s legislative session, Tuesday, Feb. 11.

During her opening statement at last night’s legislative session, a few moments before she and her colleagues swiftly gutted the proposed pay raises and new positions in Mayor Eric Papenfuse’s 2014 budget, City Council President Wanda Williams asked the assembly to remember Feb. 13, 2010.

On that day, she recalled, council rejected the proposed raises of the newly elected Mayor Linda Thompson, whose first budget included a similar raft of pay increases. “I have to be consistent and fair,” Williams said. “I cannot treat this administration any different when it comes to fiscal responsibility.” She then proceeded to lead council members through a series of votes that, amendment by amendment, strained the Papenfuse proposal through the sieve of austerity.

They cut the proposed raises for the communications director, Joyce Davis ($9,500); the finance director, Bruce Weber ($4,950); the human resources director ($4,000); and the special assistant to the mayor ($5,000). They trimmed the salary for the heftily titled “Senior Advisor for Education, Youth & Civic Engagement,” Karl Singleton ($9,500), and removed a new position, director of sustainability, from the budget entirely. They even slashed the vacant position of business administrator, from $79,500 to $75,000—less than the cut to Singleton and Davis, which makes sense, because it’s better to save the biggest slaps for faces that are actually there.

To sum up, it was the old familiar scene in city hall. Facing requests from the mayor, council members threw up a wall of resistance and naysaying in order to achieve—well, what, exactly? Apparently not savings. No sooner had council stacked up the clippings from the Papenfuse budget than they proceeded to spend them all, restoring a “diversity officer” position at an annual salary of $50,000. The decision effectively reversed a separate proposal of the mayor’s, to consolidate the diversity officer’s role, which had been vacated in early January, with another position in human resources. This led to a long and tortured discussion about whether such a position was necessary, followed by council’s conclusion that it was, followed by a recess, as it was realized that the sum of council’s alterations was an imbalanced budget. (This was finally resolved by a $5,000 cut to the restored, and vacant, diversity officer position.)

It’s fair, of course, to question whether the mayor’s proposed raises are really about attracting the “best and brightest,” as he has said. Papenfuse filled many of the positions with close allies from his campaign—no surprise there—who will no doubt stay on board irrespective of the lure of a higher salary. But residents who were pleased with council’s performance last night might pause to reflect on what it represents, and whether it’s really worth celebrating.

For one, it would appear that communication between the mayor and council has already broken down. During the recess, Papenfuse said his overtures to discuss the budget had been rebuffed by every member except Ben Allatt. (Allatt, in any case, voted in favor of the cuts.) Instead, council simply sent him their proposed amendments by email on Tuesday afternoon. One member, Sandra Reid, seemed delighted with this strategy. When asked whether she had tried to engage with the mayor, she referred, with a smile, to a “gift” she had given him—a bag of sugar cubes, with a message about everyone “having to take their lumps.” It’s one thing to disagree with the mayor, but quite another to skip the step of negotiating and head straight for childishness and snark.

The second disturbing thing about last night’s session is how little council seems to have bothered with Papenfuse’s rationales. The boost to the human resources director, for instance, was meant to reflect the addition of a labor-law background to the position’s qualifications. In testimony last week, Papenfuse explained that the solicitor’s office was routinely inundated with legal questions from human resources; by placing a lawyer at the H.R. helm, he hoped to free up the solicitor for other matters. Council ignored this justification and made the cut without discussion. They did the same for the position of mayor’s assistant, despite the fact that the “raise” really reflected a consolidation of positions in the former mayor’s cabinet, from two assistants to one.

Before and after their votes, members of council claimed to defer to a sense of fairness, particularly with regard to the financial pain distributed across Harrisburg’s populace. They wanted to be the voice of residents, who have put up with increased taxes, and workers, who have put up with frozen wages. And indeed, at the start of Tuesday’s session, a handful of residents admonished council not to grant raises to a few in the mayor’s cabinet when many continue to endure cuts in the name of recovery.

But council went a good deal further than fairness, and wound up making adjustments that were indiscriminate and, in many cases, petty. The city will now spend exactly what it would have before, but in place of the mayor’s own cabinet priorities, we have a redundancy in human resources. And, thanks to the preferred style of several members of council, we also have that old Harrisburg standby—pointless acrimony.

Continue Reading

Harrisburg 2014: A Balanced Budget?

Mayor Eric Papenfuse’s amended 2014 budget, which Harrisburg’s City Council is expected to vote on Tuesday night, has been touted as the city’s first balanced budget in years—a sign of the capital city’s successful sacrifices in the form of increased taxes and labor concessions, and a testament to its return to health after unending fiscal crisis.

But a close look reveals that the picture of a balanced budget is somewhat misleading, as the budget actually includes a $4 million shortfall, disguised in the form of a “negative expenditure” representing assumed concessions and other savings which were not realized at the time of its initial passage in December.

Deep within the 176-page budget document, under the “General Expenses” section, is a line item labeled “Concessions and Vacancies,” in the amount of $3,959,157. The item is carry-over from Mayor Linda Thompson’s final budget, adopted at the end of last year, and was retained in the amended budget Papenfuse submitted to City Council in January. The item is listed as a negative expenditure—an amount reducing, rather than adding to, the total expenditures for the year. It represents a variety of savings that the city hopes to realize before the end of 2014.

Some of these, such as the projected $1.6 million in savings achieved under the firefighters’ new labor agreement, approved by a majority union vote last Friday, have already been secured. Others, such as potential reductions in health care costs across a smaller city workforce and reductions in overtime, are hoped for but not guaranteed. The just-under $4 million figure also includes certain city positions that are budgeted for but have not yet been filled. If the city doesn’t realize all the savings that it hopes for, it could close the gap by leaving some of these vacant.

Steven Goldfield, a financial advisor to the receiver, said that the negative expenditure, while “unconventional,” should not be taken to imply a funding deficit. “We’re not going to let them adopt a budget that’s not balanced,” he said. He attributed the line item to the city’s former finance director, Robert Kroboth, and said he was uncertain why Kroboth had balanced the budget that way. The receiver and his team, Goldfield said, had emphasized to Mayor Papenfuse and the new finance director, Bruce Weber, that the new administration would have to “own this budget,” including the decision to maintain the $4 million negative expenditure line.

Weber could not be reached for comment, but Joyce Davis, the mayor’s communications director, said that Weber, the mayor and council were all aware of the negative expenditure. “It’s part of the budgeting process going forward,” she said.

Continue Reading

August Wilson’s “Fences”–Intense Family Drama at Open Stage

FencesFB1

Race and class become one on a family’s front porch in 1950s America, the setting of August Wilson’s “Fences.” The Pulitzer Prize- and Tony Award-winning drama tackled heavy issues in a light fashion during Friday’s opening night at Open Stage of Harrisburg’s thrust-stage theater.

Wilson, a Pittsburgh native, dealt with his share of bigotry as a mixed-race child of divorced parents growing up in the ‘50s. He died in 2005, only a few months after the Los Angeles opening of “Radio Golf,” his final play. Wilson’s “The Pittsburgh Cycle,” a compilation of 10 plays, including “Fences” and “Radio Golf,” are each set in a different decade and depict life for African Americans throughout the 20th century.

“Fences” centers on Troy Maxson, played by a wry Leonard Dozier, who conveys the emotion of a bitter father, straying husband and unfulfilled African-American man. At times, the audience may have laughed inappropriately, but Dozier conveyed passion and conflict that finally silenced even the faintest snickers.

Troy’s experiences with racial oppression allow him to view opportunity as something for whites only. Despite a promotion at work and the offer for his son to play football on a university team, Troy views whites, easy money and most institutions as “the devil.” Troy’s juxtaposition with son Cory (J.C. Payne) shows the failures of a father who doesn’t want his son to out-achieve him. Baseball talent Troy, prohibited from the Major Leagues because of his race and/or age, limits Cory to work and chores instead of allowing him to pursue college football. Physical fight scenes between father and son help build action while stressing their relationship and showing Troy’s age and hypocrisy.

Cory’s growth in the play leads him to the Marines, which he joins also to strike out against Troy, who similarly hates his own father. The audience senses a progression in Payne, and it feels like he actually matures during the performance. Payne effectively shows the pain of a child who hopes to do better than his own father and who struggles with repeating his parents’ mistakes while living under their roof. His final defiance against Troy—absence from his funeral—is spoiled by Cory’s mother Rose, a measure that saves Cory from becoming like him.

Sharia Benn’s Rose is not the only woman with whom Troy has fathered children. Son Lyons (Jeremy Patterson) and daughter Raynell (Seneh Green) each have different mothers. Rose is forced to raise Raynell after Troy’s mistress dies during childbirth, a tense moment that Benn nails.

Benn’s portrayal is overwhelming, as she encapsulates all the upset and abandon of a woman who has tried too long to make things work. With Troy’s news of his mistress’ baby, Benn’s easy-going Rose makes way for a heartbroken, betrayed Rose who won’t put up with nonsense any more. Her sweet demeanor changes to a deep and serious one in the following scenes with Troy, with passionate delivery that brought this reviewer to tears.

Troy’s best friend, Bono, is similarly authentic in Aaron Bomar’s performance. His gestures, facial expressions and line delivery are the most convincing in the show, as Bomar captures everyone’s favorite family friend.

Gabe (Michael Powell), Troy’s brother whom he uses for money, is a war veteran with a plate in his head. Consequently, Gabe runs around the neighborhood causing drama within the community. As the family prepares for Troy’s funeral, Powell delivers a powerful holler that, though crazy, is the most sobering moment for “Fences” characters, and the family on-stage seems to transcend the problems Troy has caused, even after his death.

The cast seems to be a real family, and the connections between characters benefit from this chemistry. These tough issues, showed in a relatable dynamic, remind us of America’s unjust past, an important step to improving the future. Open Stage’s production is a must-see, a drama, beautifully written and presented, hit straight over the fences.

August Wilson’s “Fences” runs through March 1 at Open Stage of Harrisburg, 223 Walnut St., Harrisburg. For more information, visit https://openstagehbg.com or call 717-232-OPEN.

Continue Reading

A Plan, a TRAN and City Hall

For much of Wednesday night’s budget hearing—the second regarding Mayor Eric Papenfuse’s amended budget and, like its sister hearing last week, a four-hour marathon—Councilwoman Sandra Reid aggressively set the tone, as she often has in the past year.

The recently re-elected Reid, who chairs council’s public works committee, has a confrontational style that can assert itself even over seemingly innocuous matters. Last November, she raised an awful lot of hell over what she claimed were exorbitant water bills, but which turned out to be no scandal at all. At other times, her complaints are like misbegotten PSAs: the right message, more or less, but the wrong delivery. This was the case when, on Wednesday night, council broached the topic of Papenfuse’s proposed partnership with the regional chamber, CREDC, under which CREDC will help fund an economic development position in city hall. Papenfuse has defended the proposal as a way to bring welcome assistance to the city without tapping tax dollars, which it may well prove to be, though some have reasonably wondered whether it will yield any quid pro quo.

Reid brought up the ethics question, but then drifted into a bizarre analogy, comparing the late-arriving boost from the chamber to the release of Americans in the Iran hostage crisis in 1981. “They made sure that the previous president was out of office before they let one hostage [be] released,” Reid said. Similarly, Dave Black, CREDC’s president, “didn’t do anything to help us when we were struggling financially. Now all of a sudden we have a brand new mayor, now he has $90,000 to give.”

This pugnacious quality of Reid’s also came into play during one of the more interesting points of discussion Wednesday night: whether the city should issue a tax and revenue anticipation note, or TRAN.

A TRAN is a form of short-term debt aimed at solving a cash-flow problem that afflicts many municipalities. A municipality must make payroll throughout the year, but it typically receives the bulk of its revenue in bunches. In Harrisburg, the largest influx of revenue occurs in March, when most residents pay their property taxes. A second injection, from the state, is subject to the caprice of the state budgeting process. Last year, the city received $5 million, much more than in years past, but didn’t get the money til October. The periods just before these influxes, like the last days of the month for someone living from paycheck to paycheck, can get pretty lean. The purpose of a TRAN is to establish a line of credit the municipality can draw upon in the event of a funding shortfall.

In December, under advice from the receiver, Harrisburg requested proposals from lenders for terms of a possible TRAN. According to Steve Goldfield, a financial advisor on the receiver’s team, a number of “one-time events” had placed additional pressure on Harrisburg’s budget, among them a spate of retirements since the fall and a delay in consummating the recovery plan. Though the city ended the year with a projected fund balance of $4 million, there’s a chance it might feel a pinch by the end of February and struggle to pay all its bills. The TRAN offer the city ultimately accepted, from Metro Bank, would likely be issued in the amount of $2 million—enough to cover any temporary shortfall before March revenues arrive.

In the eyes of Papenfuse administration, the $2 million TRAN is a modest proposal. Bruce Weber, formerly a council member, and now the mayor’s budget and finance director, has called it an “insurance policy.” It would cost Harrisburg around $15,000 in fees, plus interest on any portion of the $2 million that the city actually draws on, at an annual rate of 2.5 percent. At the first budget hearing, on Jan. 30, Weber expressed the administration’s hope that the amount drawn on “would be nothing,” and that the TRAN would expire “quietly” on June 30, the end of its term.

For some, however, the merest mention of new debt was enough to raise alarms. In a typewritten testimony submitted to council, Nevin Mindlin, the former independent candidate for mayor, took the TRAN as evidence that the recovery plan was already “headed for failure.” The city, he wrote, “remains in financial distress, as indicated by the need to take on debt to pay its bills”; given the city’s fund balance of $4 million, he added, there was “no excuse” for a TRAN. Reid concurred. In the wake of the recovery plan, she said, “We thought it would be kumbaya and angels singing.” How could it be that, barely more than a month into the new year, the city might already need to borrow again?

In a city so recently scarred by bad debt, it’s reasonable to be wary of anything even resembling a frivolous loan. But not all debt is created equal, and Reid, along with her colleagues on council, must know that sooner or later the city will have to borrow. When it does, a track record of modest, responsible borrowing will be a good thing to have. A TRAN, with its short term, its low interest rate, and its limited scope, is about as far from extravagance as debt can be. Neil Grover, the city solicitor, likened it to an individual applying for a gas card or other simple line of credit to rebuild her rating after bankruptcy. “The city needs to re-establish itself in the market,” he said.

In his column this month, Lawrance Binda, TheBurg’s editor-in-chief, described the return to “normalcy” he hopes will occur in Harrisburg. “In many places, normalcy would be judged as a low bar to aim for,” he writes. “However, in Harrisburg, it would represent an improvement, an end to years of uninterrupted crisis.” On council, and among some members of the public, the debate over a TRAN was greeted with reflexive distrust, as if it represented an extension of that crisis. But however council settles the debate, they should recognize—and we should be relieved to know—it’s a normal debate to have.

Continue Reading

The High Cost of (Cheaper) Parking

“Stop the parking meter hike! Make the rich pay, not the workers! Don’t squeeze workers and small business. This is a tax on the people!”

If you poked your head into the public sphere during the past two weeks, you probably encountered a complaint about Harrisburg’s parking fee hike, adopted in the fall as part of the receiver’s recovery plan and taking full effect this month.

The new rates at on-street meters—$3 per hour in the central business district, $1.50 per hour outside it—and the extension of hours to include Saturdays and weekday evenings, from 5 to 7 p.m., have prompted angry reactions from just about every corner. Complaints that the changes are “draconian” or “sudden,” or that they’ll spell doom for downtown businesses, could be heard at Tuesday’s parking forum at the Hilton, arranged by Roxbury News. If you missed that, you could find them on TheBurg’s Facebook page, or in the PennLive comments section, or in an online petition drawn up by a local entrepreneur.

The quote at the top of this article, though, isn’t from Harrisburg and isn’t from this year. It actually comes from a flyer handed out in the fall of 2009, at a meeting of the Municipal Transportation Authority in San Francisco’s city hall. At the time, the San Francisco MTA was beginning to undertake a parking meter study that would lead to expanded hours, increased enforcement, and—in many places—increased rates. A group of activists who opposed the study, from the ANSWER Coalition (for “Act Now to Stop War and End Racism”), handed out the flyers as people entered the room. During the meeting, a representative from ANSWER took to the microphone and issued warnings about a “tax that is disproportionately put on the poor, the working class and small-business owners.”

What the activists didn’t seem to realize was that the parking study was actually designed to achieve goals that ANSWER, several of whose members opposed the Iraq war under the mantra “No Blood for Oil,” might have shared. The MTA study was based on the principles outlined in “The High Cost of Free Parking,” a landmark text in urban planning by Donald Shoup.

In his book, Shoup, an economist and urban planning professor at UCLA, argues that the wide availability of underpriced parking in America has had devastating consequences for the environment and for our cities. For decades, urban planners sought to make cities accessible to cars—for example, by requiring new developments to provide adequate off-street parking. The result, according to Shoup, is that people now expect to find parking everywhere they drive, which in turn encourages them to favor cars over every other form of travel. “Free parking,” he writes, “helps to explain…extreme automobile dependence, rapid urban sprawl, and extravagant energy use.”

To correct this, Shoup suggests, cities should embrace three remedies. First, they should match the price of curb parking to demand, which usually means increasing it. Second, they should stop requiring new developments to provide ample off-street parking for potential customers. Finally, they should direct any additional parking revenues to projects in the neighborhoods where they are collected. The ultimate goal is to eliminate the expectation of cheap and abundant parking everywhere we travel, thereby encouraging more people to walk, carpool, and use public transit and reducing the number of cars on the road.

I thought of Shoup’s work this week and last, when the public reaction to the new rates in Harrisburg reached fever pitch. Harrisburg differs from San Francisco and other cities in that the demand for parking has never been so great as to produce congestion. But Harrisburg has also suffered the ill effects of cheap and abundant parking. People who live in the city often drive when they could bike or walk, and people outside the city drive alone when they could carpool or use public transit. This has obvious environmental costs, but it also has social consequences. Much of the city looks the way it does because its planners, for several decades running, have operated on the assumption that everyone will drive everywhere they go. As a result, we have wide urban highways slicing up neighborhoods and surface lots and multi-story garages dotting our downtown.

I now wonder whether the reaction to the parking hike is really a knee-jerk resistance to changes that city residents would have readily embraced if they’d been presented in a different frame. No one likes to pay more for things, of course, and there are plenty of reasons to be wary of increased fees in a city whose management of money has been, shall we say, less than sterling. (Where those fees will be going under the new arrangement, and whether that’s an improvement, will be the subject of a second parking column next week.)

But I think that a long view of the new parking system should acknowledge several potential upsides. For one, daily commuters who previously dodged garage rates will now, as a result of higher on-street rates and increased enforcement, be pushed into the garages. That may not seem obviously good for the city, except that, under the new arrangement, a portion of the higher revenues will flow into the city’s general fund. If City Council and the mayor take Shoup’s advice, and direct some of these revenues towards the improvement of the district producing them, I suspect downtown businesses will come to see the rate hike as less of a threat.

City residents, for their part, will have an incentive to walk, bike or carpool where previously they drove. That’s good for the environment, and though it may require a change in ingrained habits, I suspect such a change is more likely to occur than not. Last week, several business owners expressed a worry that their customers would flee for venues with free parking. That may be true for some suburban customers, but I’d wager that businesses have nothing to fear from city residents, who locate here in part because they want proximity to urban amenities. We’re more likely to walk or share the cost of parking with friends than to ditch Federal Taphouse and Little Amps for the Olive Garden and Starbucks. Federal Taphouse and Little Amps are part of why we moved here.

That brings me to the suburban customers. It may be the case that downtown businesses will lose some of their customers who drive into Harrisburg expressly for weekday happy hours and Saturday events. But here, again, I’d urge business owners to take the long view. In the short term, they may have to work to keep some suburban customers with incentives like rewards for carpooling or parking validations. But in the long term, these patrons will be replaced by new urban ones, as easy access to urban amenities becomes increasingly dependent on actual proximity to them.

A recent comment on our Facebook page is a good demonstration of this point. Last week, we posted the photo above, of a new downtown meter, on our wall. Below it, a reader from Mechanicsburg lamented that, because of the addition of Saturday parking charges, what was once a free afternoon in the city for the film and art festival “will now be an approx $20 expense.” “I’m sure this will be changing my plans,” he added.

When I read that, I thought, Which plans? The ones to live outside the city but have free and easy access to its amenities? It’s a well-worn point that the rise of the automobile contributed to the decline of many an American city, including this one. Our continued deference to car ownership, in the form of cheap parking, has helped to artificially devalue what cities have to offer. As Shoup writes, “Free parking is an invitation to drive wherever we go.” Parking in Harrisburg wasn’t free, but it was cheap and abundant—and as a result, it was an invitation for people to enjoy the amenities a city can offer without paying city property taxes or sending their children to city schools. To the extent that it’s an invitation to live here, rather than simply park here, the fee hike in Harrisburg may not be such a bad thing.

Continue Reading

Time & Materials: A Harrisburg clockmaker & the craft of keeping time.

An unfinished brass wall clock Arnold has been building for the past several years. The engraving was done by a late friend from Chicago, and the bearings and jewels he bought elsewhere. "Other than that, everything here I made."

An unfinished brass wall clock Arnold has been building for the past several years. The engraving was done by a late friend from Chicago, and the bearings and jewels he bought elsewhere. “Other than that, everything here I made.”

On a recent weekday, David Arnold, a certified master clockmaker with a workshop on Logan Street, Uptown, removed an antique pocket watch from a small brown envelope and began taking it to pieces.

The watch, made in 1908 by the Elgin National Watch Company, some thirty miles outside Chicago, was about the size of a hockey puck, with a tarnished silveroid case and a porcelain dial. One of Arnold’s regular customers, an avid collector, had sent it in for a basic tune-up: a cleaning and polishing, change of oil, possibly a replacement mainspring. But once the watch was open, Arnold knew, he might find more to attend to. “In an old watch,” he says, “Lord only knows what you’re gonna find.”

He pried open the case and popped off the hands. Loosening two screws, he lifted free the movement—the assembly of springs, jewels, wheels and gears that keeps time—and detached the dial. The dial, made of porcelain fired on a copper disk, bore several hairline cracks that had filled with dirt. He placed it inside one of several mesh baskets, alongside other pieces he dismantled, in preparation for an ultrasonic bath.

When Arnold came to the watch’s balance wheel, he paused. The balance wheel is a watch’s primary timekeeping element, performing much the same function as a grandfather clock’s pendulum. It contains a coil, called a hairspring, whose oscillations regulate the release of power stored up when a watch is wound. A brass ring dotted with tiny brass knobs, the balance wheel resembles a ship’s wheel in miniature. When the watch is running, it rapidly spins one way, then the other, while the hairspring pulses in the middle, expanding and contracting.

The brass knobs circling the balance wheel are called timing screws, and they contribute small but significant amounts of mass. They can be added to slow down a watch if it’s running fast, or removed to speed it up if it’s running slow. They should be lined up symmetrically along the wheel’s circumference, but the ones in the Elgin pocket watch were asymmetrical, with two extra screws on one side.

In his repairs, Arnold often comes upon the handiwork of people he calls “impairmen”—folks who don’t really know what they’re doing, and leave pieces worse than they found them. He suspected that someone had slapped on the timing screws unevenly while trying to solve a separate problem. The result was an “out-of-poise condition”: an imbalanced balance wheel, unable to keep good time.

Once the case was buffed and the parts were clean, Arnold set about bringing the balance wheel back to poise. He added symmetrical screws, fitted the wheel back inside the movement and hooked it up to a timing machine, labeled “MULTIFUNCTION TIMEGRAPHER.” As the watch ticked, scattered dots appeared on the display screen in uneven bands. The timegrapher posted a reading: -449 s/d, nearly eight minutes slow per day.

Arnold extracted the wheel from the movement, removed some screws, and tried the timegrapher again. Now the watch was running as fast as it had been slow. He needed more mass. He reached into a drawer and took out an assortment of test tubes, plugged with cork, each containing a handful of miniscule washers. The tubes were labeled in minutes and seconds—the amount of time by which a pair of washers, once added to the balance wheel, would slow down the watch each day.

As Arnold fitted the washers, a plaintive meow came through the door. “Zeke! Hey buddy! Oh, my friend,” he said. It was snowing. His white cat, Zeke, padded into the shop, trailing wet paw prints. “You want a treat, don’t ya.” Zeke meowed. “I know, Zeke. I know.” He fished a bag of cat treats out of a drawer.

Washer by washer, Arnold slowed the balance wheel down to just under two minutes fast per day. But the timegrapher was recording another problem. The balance wheel was now swinging out of beat. He adjusted its orientation, but the problem persisted. “Most bench watchmakers hate antique watches for just this reason,” he said. “You’re always battling a hundred years of wear, and every pair of hands that the watch has been through.”

A couple of hours passed. Arnold spotted a few more flaws, and made innumerable tiny corrections, yet couldn’t get the timekeeping where he wanted. He knew there was a balance to strike between the value of the watch and the labor it would take to repair it completely. This Elgin wasn’t worth much more than $100. But then, he hated to do a job only part of the way.

Around 2 o’clock, he decided it was time for a break. He believed he had located the source of the trouble, but he had been working for nearly four hours—longer by far than it had ever taken him to set a watch in beat. He put the movement back in its polished case, behind the now-spotless dial, and set it on the table. Then he went into the fridge in the back of his shop and took out an IPA.

Arnold repaired his first timepiece in 1964—a brown mantel clock that still sits on a high shelf in his workshop, above a sign that says “Not For Sale.” He was 13 years old, and had no formal training. “But, frankly, that was my gift,” he told me. “I’m able to look at a mechanical device and see the way it’s supposed to work, even when it’s not working.” In the late 1960s, as the U.S. was escalating its troop presence in Vietnam, Arnold enlisted for alternative service as a conscientious objector. (“Jesus said that he who takes by the sword dies by the sword, and I believe he meant that,” he said. “You die spiritually in the act of picking it up.”) He was stationed at a hospital in Elgin, Ill., home to the Elgin National Watch Company, where he met an instructor from the watch college who took Arnold under his wing.

On March 12, 1968, a surveying team for the Atlantic Richfield Company discovered an oil field at Prudhoe Bay, on the Alaska North Slope. A consortium of oil companies began lobbying for permission to construct a trans-Alaskan pipeline, which Congress granted in 1973, in the midst of the Arab oil embargo. Arnold applied for a job on the line, and, after five months of waiting for his number to come up, he was hired. He worked in a labor camp for a year and a half, in nine-week stretches of consecutive 12- to 14-hour shifts, separated by two weeks of vacation.

The job was physically demanding—“working out in a ditch at 40 below,” he says, through months-long stretches without sunlight. But the food was good (“steak twice a week, prime rib once a week, fresh crab salads, oysters Rockefeller”), and so was the pay. “Every Tuesday or Wednesday I’d be asking myself, ‘What in the world am I doing here?’ And then on Friday they’d come and they’d hand me this paycheck, and I’d go, ‘Ohhh, yeah.’”

After his work on the pipeline, Arnold returned to Illinois, where he took a position at Craft Clocks and Gifts in Elmhurst, a Chicago suburb. “I bullshitted my way, literally, into the job as the repairman at the largest clock shop in Chicago,” he said. Though he had only ever repaired one clock, Arnold was a quick study, and, within six weeks, Craft had given him his first apprentice. Over the next several years, he hired and trained the company’s entire clock department, eventually overseeing an operation that installed upwards of 500 floor clocks each year. In 1981, he passed the national trade organization’s exam and became a certified master clockmaker.

Arnold has a white ponytail and moustache and creased blue eyes. In shop, he wears blue jeans, a work shirt buttoned at the wrists and, usually, a magnifying visor on his forehead. He lives with his wife, Sandy, in a house nearby on 4th Street, and the pair grow fruits and vegetables in an adjoining lot, including pears, plums, apricots, asparagus and a variety of berries. (They also keep bees, whose honey they promote and sell via a Facebook page, “Sweet Honey in ‘Da Hood.”) He speaks admiringly of things of quality: watches, of course, but also good whiskey, good wine, and good conversation. He once described the late Henry Fried, a preeminent American watchmaker and an acquaintance, as a “brilliant, brilliant, brilliant man.” Parting company, he says “blessings” by way of goodbye. Even on a day when he was feeling “crappy,” his expression tended to settle on a beatific grin.

In the early 1990s, after several years running a repair shop near Fayetteville, Arnold decided to become a minister. “I’d felt a call all my life, but I ran away from that call for a long time,” he said. He sold all of his equipment, got a bachelor’s degree (history, with a minor in philosophy) and enrolled at Wesley Theological Seminary, in Washington, D.C. Over the next decade, he served a number of churches, the last of which was Rockville United Methodist, off Linglestown Road. “He was a terrific pastor and a terrific person,” Joyce Ralph, a Rockville parishioner, told me. When Ralph’s mother died, Arnold, who had never met her, visited with her family and later gave a funeral service that “astounded” her friends and relatives. “They couldn’t believe he didn’t know her,” she said.

“I enjoyed ministering to the people, and I enjoyed worship,” Arnold told me. “But I am not an administrator. I’m too ADD.” Eventually, he realized he was “probably not the best person” to run a local church, and he resigned from Rockville in 2004. “My ex-wife of twenty years told me she couldn’t live with me anymore, and that’s when I decided it was time,” he said. In 2006, he bought a garage on Logan Street, converted it into a workshop, and returned to the business of clock and watch repair.

On a Wednesday night in the middle of winter, before going to bed, you set an alarm for 7:15 a.m. The alarm, on a clock radio, or more likely, a phone, rouses you the next morning in darkness. You shower and eat in time to catch an 8:07 bus, which deposits you at work just before 9:00 a.m. You swipe your digital time card, and the machine beeps to alert you it’s counting—counting the hours, for you and everyone else, as you turn time into money.

The tools we have to measure time, making it possible for time to condition our lives, are so ubiquitous and so reliable that we mostly take them for granted. What time is it? My computer knows, to an extraordinary degree of accuracy. How long did it take? My phone can tell me exactly. Yet our access to private timekeepers—and the idea, moreover, that these devices should be synched to an internationally accepted divvying-up of days—is a remarkably recent achievement.

The earliest clocks marshaled the steady “flow” of various natural processes. These could be more or less reliable, depending on the process involved. The Greeks, for example, used various kinds of water clock, or clepsydrae, to time public events like speeches and chariot races. An exhibit at the National Watch and Clock Museum, in Columbia, Penn., features a demonstration clepsydra based on a design from around the 2nd century B.C. It’s essentially a wide, heavy bowl with a tiny hole in the bottom which, when placed in a tub of water, fills up at a consistent rate. Or at least, relatively consistent. A plaque above the exhibit informs visitors that speechmakers occasionally added silt to their clepsydrae, slowing the water’s flow, a time-extending technique that gave rise to the phrase “Don’t muddy the water.”

Mechanical clocks, at least when they were first developed, some time in the 13th century, were hardly more dependable. The real significance of clocks that used gears, the historian David S. Landes argues in his book “Revolution in Time,” was that they incorporated an oscillatory motion—initially of a weighted bar, called a foliot, later of a pendulum—that lent them a back-and-forth, rhythmic quality, audible as a ticking sound. The mechanical clock, in other words, divided time into a succession of regular, countable beats. The “unknown genius who built the first mechanical clock,” Landes writes, “set time measurement on a new path and planted the seed of all subsequent improvements in chronometry.” As another plaque at the National Watch and Clock Museum puts it, “Time no longer flowed through a clepsydra—it ticked.”

Something whose beats could be counted could be made to beat more accurately, and after the invention of the mechanical clock, innumerable refinements followed. Yet in their quest for improvement, clockmakers faced an unrelenting enemy: the effects of time itself. Any machine that runs 24 hours a day will eventually wear out, lose accuracy, and break down. Landes relates the story of a cathedral clock in Cambrai, in northern France, requiring various repairs and several complete overhauls over the course of a century and a half. The cathedral’s records indicate continual maintenance, but nonetheless, an account from 1435 “brings the mention that the clock ‘was in great ruin.’”

“You’re searching for perfection, but perfection is unachievable,” Arnold said. “Any shortcut you take keeps you short of perfection. And so that’s probably the most demanding thing about the trade, is that you have to do it all the way.” One way to prevent wear in watches is through the placement of synthetic jewels, whose hardness prevents scratching and warping. “A watch with enough jewels will run for a looong time without wear,” Arnold said. But even then, the lubrication will eventually start to break down. Even high-priced luxury watches need to have their oil changed every three to five years.

“Give me the perfect oil,” Abraham Louis-Breguet, the great 18th-century horologist, is supposed to have said, “and I’ll build you the perfect watch.” There is no perfect oil, of course, and no perfect watch. But a nearly perfect watch may be a better symbol, conveying both human mastery and human limitations—our capacity to divide and measure the universe, and the universe’s ultimate indomitability. “O let not Time deceive you,” the poet W. H. Auden wrote. “You cannot conquer Time.”

My first conversation with Dave Arnold was not about clocks or watches. In early November, I called him about a letter he had written to the Patriot-News, about the effects of a trash-pickup fee hike on his business. City council had raised prices indiscriminately, and his shop, despite producing less waste than his home, was being charged at a commercial rate. “My annual cost to get rid of two trash cans a month,” he wrote, “is going to total $1,582.80! Do you have any idea how many watches I have to fix to pay for that?”

Arnold has the sort of independent streak you tend to associate with small business: one that demands dignity of labor, prizes quality over volume and speed, and reflexively stands up for the little guy. The privatization of Harrisburg’s sanitation services, a proposal that made headlines last fall, struck him as another iteration of the old capitalist lie. “What do we want?” he asked me. “More Walmart workers? Collecting food stamps and collecting Medicaid because they can’t make a decent living?” One time, describing his own religious outlook, he brought up Pope Francis: “He’s actually holding up what Jesus said, and trying to do what Jesus said to do. And he’s criticizing the economic system that keeps so many people in poverty and enriches a very few inordinately.”

This streak flared recently during a crisis within the American watchmaking community. In the early 2000s, a number of Swiss watch manufacturers began restricting the sale of parts to independent watchmakers. In 2005, Andre Fleury, a watchmaker based in California, sued Richemont, a luxury goods holding company, in federal court, charging that the company was employing monopolistic practices. The national trade organization, the American Watchmakers-Clockmakers Institute, voted not to intervene, which angered many watchmakers, including Arnold, who felt the organization had failed to stand up for its members’ interests. To make matters worse, AWCI’s president at the time elected to intervene on his own; the court determined there was no conflict of interest, and treated him as an individual watchmaker. Ultimately, the case ended in a settlement that many watchmakers saw as favorable to the Swiss companies. Under the agreement, in order to gain access to Swiss parts, watchmakers now had to submit to an inspection, purchase certified equipment, and undergo new training, to the tune of several thousands of dollars.

“They caved utterly,” Arnold told me. “What is the point of having a national trade organization, if not to stand up for the independent watchmaker?” He had once served as a vice-president at AWCI, and written for its trade publication, “Horological Times.” But, this year, disgusted with the outcome of the litigation, he declined to renew his membership. (Jordan Ficklin, AWCI’s executive director, told me it was “the opinion of AWCI that parts should be readily available, but it is the reality that many brands choose not to sell them. We wish we had more influence, but we can’t dictate what industry will do.”)

Despite this, Arnold’s respect for Swiss craftsmanship is undiminished. Once, I brought in a New York Times watch-industry insert, a booklet of several glossy photos of fine Swiss watches. He paged through it, admiring the designs. “They do beautiful work!” he said. “There’s no question, they do beautiful work.”

Arnold has an abiding preoccupation with fairness, though his idea of fairness can so heavily favor his customers that it occasionally seems to defy good business sense. Once, a woman brought in an estimate she had gotten years ago from a factory service center for a wristwatch repair. Arnold glanced at the slip. “Outrageous!” he said. He quoted her a price—less than half the factory’s estimate, which had been made in 1996.

“I think that a workman deserves a fair wage,” he said, when I asked him about it later. “At the same time, some places charge a lot of money to get something fixed. And I don’t want to say that their work isn’t worth what they’re asking, because if they’re able to get it, obviously it’s worth what they’re asking. But I’m more comfortable sleeping well at night, knowing that I’m charging a fair price for the work that I do, and being able to smile and look the customer in the eye when they pick it up.”

Another time, a customer walked in with a watch that needed to be resized. In a matter of minutes, Arnold hammered out the pins and removed four links from the wristband. When the customer asked what he owed, Arnold told him not to worry about it.

“Geez, you can’t keep doing that,” the customer said.

“Yeah, I know,” Arnold replied.

The customer turned to me. “Every time I come over here, he says, ‘Ah, don’t worry about it.’”

After the man had left, Arnold clarified. “Usually I would charge something, but the neighbors here on the street I generally don’t charge, because they keep an eye on the place.” He’s known to replace watch batteries for neighborhood children for free. They only cost a few cents anyway, and then the kids will sit and talk with him. “Goodwill is worth a lot,” he said.

In January, I paid a visit to the Henri Stern Watch Agency, in New York’s Rockefeller Plaza. There, beyond a pair of tall glass doors, were the regional offices and service center of Patek Philippe, the luxury watch manufacturer headquartered in Geneva. Henri Stern moved into the suite last year, and the lobby still had a glossy, unlived-in quality. As I entered, a receptionist was speaking into a phone, alerting someone out of sight that there were customers “waiting in rooms one and three for assistance.” A moment later, a bald, broad-shouldered man in a semi-opaque white lab coat and white Crocs padded across the lobby and disappeared through a door in the opposite wall, which closed without making a sound.

A public relations manager, wearing a silk dress and knee-high black boots, gave me a brisk tour of the center. We visited a conference room with a view of the plaza’s skating rink, five stories below; an open-plan kitchen; and a number of offices with crystal doors. In a locker room, outside the service floor, we slipped cloth booties over our feet, to keep the room clear of stray particles. Inside, dispersed among several high tables, were watchmakers in lab coats, working quietly on watches. On a window sill, a machine like a series of bracelets mounted on poles rotated slowly, imitating the motion of the human wrist.

I was hoping to see—I don’t know what, exactly. Someone like Dave Arnold, I suppose, who would take down a bottle of Alaskan crude oil off a high shelf, or flip open an ancient case of washers in glass tubes, or show me the work of an impairman under a lens. But that was impossible: I was among the world’s most nearly perfect watches, which had little time for a novice. We passed a filing cabinet cabled to the ceiling, and a long, narrow drawer with miniscule parts in labeled cases, and then I was out the door. It seemed to be over in a few minutes, but I can’t be sure. Forgetting to check my phone, I had lost track of time.

Correction: An earlier version of this article referred imprecisely to the involvement of the American Watchmakers-Clockmakers Institute in a recent lawsuit. The AWCI’s former president joined the lawsuit as an individual, not as a representative of AWCI.

Continue Reading

Connected at the Heart: Valentine’s Day–Theatre Harrisburg Style

Screenshot 2014-01-31 09.38.39Could it be karma? Or perhaps coincidence? Or maybe just foresight and good planning.

For couples in love or those with stars in their eyes, it appears that Theatre Harrisburg has planned an event so perfect in its conception that it’s come together like some romantic puzzle. So let’s take a look at the pieces.

On Feb. 14, Theatre Harrisburg will present “Evening of Romance.” It’s on a Friday—close to the weekend and absolutely perfect for those lovers or wannabes who wish to express what’s in their hearts for their significant other. Feb. 14 is Valentine’s Day. Remember?

“Evening of Romance” will take place in Uptown Harrisburg at the Jay & Nancy Krevsky Production Center, 513 Hurlock St. No big deal, right? But it is.

“It is appropriate that this event is being held here, named after a couple who met in this building, fell in love and married,” says Samuel Kuba, executive director of the theater. “Jay and Nancy’s passion for each other and Theatre Harrisburg has never diminished after all these years.”

Are you beginning to notice a theme here? Okay. Stay focused. There’s more.

Doors to the event will open at 6:45 p.m. There’ll be complimentary champagne, a gourmet dessert buffet and flowers and candy for each guest. No need to rush out and get the obligatory (and somewhat boring) heart-shaped box of chocolates and wilting posies. Theatre Harrisburg takes care of all that for you, and it’ll all be quite artistic. Additionally, there will be several special grand door prizes awarded. All of this amidst a sparkling draped lobby, illuminated by candlelight and decorated with fresh flowers. See? One less item to worry about in impressing that special person.

Next.

As you gaze into the eyes of that wonderful someone, you will be serenaded by songs sung by Jonathan and Beverly Hudson of Palmyra, another real-life married couple (there’s that romance theme again) with selections from Mozart’s “Don Giovanni,” “Candide” and other selections, including works by Verdi, Gershwin and Irving Berlin. All or most will surely speak to the affairs of the heart. Along with being a duet in the true sense of the word, the Hudsons have a creative connection to Theatre Harrisburg: Jonathan lent his operatic vocals to the show “The Last Romance” staged at the theater last summer which starred…wait for it… the Krevskys. Beverly starred in the 2012 production of “A Little Night Music” presented by Theatre Harrisburg at Whitaker’s Sunoco Theatre.

“Together, these two artists will generate enough musical heat to warm any heart and take the chill off even the most frigid weather,” Kuba says.

The puzzle is almost complete. Onward.

At 8 p.m. that evening, there will be a performance of the Ken Ludwig romantic farce “Lend Me A Tenor,” a lightning-fast, non-stop laugh fest that, at its core, involves several different—and sometimes unlikely—couples. One of those couples is the constantly quarreling spouses, Tito and Maria Merelli, played by—you guessed it—real-life husband and wife, Anthony and Ann Ariano. In keeping with the romance theme, all disagreements will remain on the stage and true domestic bliss will prevail. Audiences will witness every nuance because the venue’s intimate space guarantees everyone an up-close-and-personal experience.

So, could anything or any evening be more perfect? A venue named for a loving couple, sung by another loving couple, and performed by yet another loving couple. Candy, flowers, champagne, gourmet desserts, prizes, candlelight, Mozart and Gershwin. You can’t ask for more.

Wait, there IS more.

As if Theatre Harrisburg had some sort of magic wand, there will be a full moon that night.

C’mon, Theatre Harrisburg. You planned all this, right?

You did, didn’t you?

“Evening of Romance” will take place on Feb. 14, at Theatre Harrisburg, 513 Hurlock St., Harrisburg. Tickets available by visiting or calling Whitaker Center Box Office, 717-214-ARTS. “Lend Me a Tenor” runs Feb. 7 to 23.

 

 

 

Continue Reading