
Rendering of the Tunnel to Towers housing project. Photo courtesy of Tunnel to Towers.
A project to provide housing for veterans in Harrisburg is moving forward, despite lingering questions about future use of a portion of the Capital Area Greenbelt, which runs through the proposed project site.
On Monday, the Tunnel to Towers Foundation formally announced its proposal to build a “veterans village” in South Harrisburg for those who are experiencing homelessness, having received zoning approval from the Harrisburg Planning Commission last week. The zoning issues now move on to the city’s Zoning Hearing Board for consideration.
The organization, which has completed similar projects nationwide, shared its plans for Harrisburg on its website months ago, but has only recently begun working through the city approval process.
Tunnel to Towers would be one of three projects to address homelessness planned for S. Front Street, near the PennDOT building. In May, Veteran’s Outreach of Central PA cut the ribbon on “Veterans Grove,” a completed tiny house village, and Missouri-based Eden Village has also proposed a tiny home community for the unhoused.
Tunnel to Towers has proposed constructing a 64-unit apartment complex and 20 one-bedroom “Comfort Homes” on an 8.5-acre plot of land. The comfort homes will be 500 square feet and include a living room, bedroom, kitchen and bathroom, providing permanent housing for veterans and first responders.
There will also be support services for veterans, including job training, legal services, benefits assistance, education assistance, mental health support and counseling.
“No veteran should be homeless,” said Frank Siller, chairman and CEO of Tunnel to Towers Foundation. “They put everything on the line for us. Unfortunately, many veterans feel lost when they return after their service, and thousands become homeless. That is unacceptable.”
At a Harrisburg Planning Commission meeting on June 5, board members heard from the organization and asked questions about the future of the Capital Area Greenbelt, as the project would take place on the land that currently shares the trail.
While the land is private property, the Greenbelt Association has for years maintained written permission from the landowner to provide public access to the trail and has also provided maintenance to the area, according to Greenbelt Association President Doug Hill. Currently, access to the portion of the Greenbelt past PennDOT is restricted, and the city has provided an alternate route over the Sycamore Street bridge and down Cameron Street.
While the Tunnel to Towers officials shared that they have been meeting with the Capital Area Greenbelt Association, a conclusion has not been reached yet on the future use of the trail.
“This has always been private property, and the Greenbelt has been fortunate to use that. So, we want to see if we can continue that, compatible with the needs of the private property owners,” said Bruce Grossman, attorney for Tunnel to Towers.
Hill spoke at the planning meeting, sharing his proposal for a new route. Having seen Tunnel to Towers’ sketch plan for the project, he believes that the Greenbelt could continue on its current path, outside of the project’s proposed gated community, until reaching the parcel’s southern boundary, where it would continue around until reaching the bridge over the railroad tracks, connecting back to the Greenbelt trail.
“We are very much supportive of the Tunnel to Towers project,” Hill said. “The sketch plan that they’ve done, including its configuration and the configuration of the fencing, would be able to accommodate the Greenbelt.”
However, officials with Tunnel to Towers expressed concerns about security, saying that they believe drug use has been an issue along that stretch of the Greenbelt.
However, Hill contested the representation that drug use is a “rampant” issue and City Planning Director Geoff Knight said that any illegal activity would likely not be as much of an issue once the area is developed.
“I would venture that it’s probably safer down there than it is in downtown Harrisburg,” said Vern McKissick, a planning commission member. “I’m having a tougher time accepting that as the only reason that this can’t happen.”
In the end, the commission voted to recommend the variance and special exception for the project, but opted to slightly alter a condition in the document to strengthen the language to say that the applicant “shall coordinate” with the Greenbelt Association rather than “shall continue to coordinate.”
“The planning bureau feels very strongly that this really needs to be included in a final design, however that may happen,” said Geoff Knight, city planning director. “We recognize that this is private property as the applicant said, but at the same time, it’s also a critical more than a 100-year-old part of the city’s infrastructure.”
Tunnel to Towers will next need to get Zoning Hearing Board approval, then have its land development plan approved by the city.
If you like what we do, please support our work. Become a Friend of TheBurg!