Tag Archives: Gloria Martin-Roberts

Enemy of My Enemy

GMRWeb

City Council President Wanda Williams (back, center) looks on as Gloria Martin-Roberts announces her candidacy for Harrisburg mayor.

In the long, storied run of “The Simpsons,” one of the most famous episodes is a hilarious parody entitled “Who Shot Mr. Burns?”

In this two-part episode, police question the resentful citizens of Springfield as they search for a suspect in the shooting of nuclear power mogul C. Montgomery Burns. It turns out that nearly everyone in town is a suspect because they all feel wronged by him.

That episode strangely came to my mind yesterday as I watched former City Council President Gloria Martin-Roberts announce her candidacy for Harrisburg mayor. To my knowledge, Martin-Roberts has never had a personal falling out with Mayor Eric Papenfuse. However, those gathered around her—her supporters—were a veritable who’s who of people who might find reason for targeting (politically, that is) the often-combative first-term mayor, who has not yet declared for reelection.

City Treasurer Dan Miller sat quietly in the audience. He lost to Papenfuse twice in the last mayoral race.

Current Council President Wanda Williams held high a “Gloria Roberts for Mayor” sign. She’s called Papenfuse a liar and much worse.

The owners of the Third Street Café stopped by to applaud and offer support. Papenfuse has tenaciously tried to put them out of business.

There was vocal critic/former school board President Jennifer Smallwood, former political rival Nate Curtis, one-time Broad Street Market Manager Rafiyqa Muhammad and several old supporters of Steve Reed, whose legacy the mayor has tried to dismantle piece by piece. And, speaking of which, the event was held at the National Civil War Museum, which Papenfuse has famously tried to shut down, making it perhaps the most delicious setting in the city for his enemies to gather together.

I didn’t spot any of the county commissioners, nor anyone from the Harrisburg Chamber, DCED or the regional visitor’s bureau, who all have done battle with Papenfuse. However, PennLive—which Papenfuse is boycotting—was represented, if just by the website’s ubiquitous city reporter doing her job.

Now, most politicians, if they stay in office long enough, accumulate a pile of critics, naysayers and downright haters. It’s the nature of the job. However, Papenfuse has managed to tick off, at one time or another, members of nearly every power center in the region outside of his own administration.

It will be fascinating to watch how this plays out in next year’s election. In my opinion, Papenfuse has done a good job in his core duties as mayor: the budget, finances, service delivery, economic development, management—the things I care most about. He’s also a passionate advocate for the city and can be almost amusingly jovial at public events. But, in doing his job, he’s stepped on a lot of toes and vociferously criticized a host of the important and self-important.

Papenfuse has told me that he’s taken often-controversial positions out of principle and believes his strong, vocal tactics were correct and defensible. However, what he calls justified, others have seen as unnecessary in substance and pompous in style.

Interestingly, Martin-Roberts didn’t speak Papenfuse’s name at all, allowing her criticisms to be implicit. For more than a half-hour, she took her rapt audience on a nostalgia trip of old Harrisburg, naming store after store that made up a part of her childhood (Martha’s Turntable, anyone?). She also said she would seek to unite the entire city.

“I don’t favor an individual neighborhood,” she said, in a clear dig at Papenfuse.

Martin-Roberts even complimented Steve Reed, with whom she often battled, for helping to revitalize downtown, even though Reed was frequently criticized for paying too much attention to white, wealthy downtown, a similar criticism now directed at Papenfuse and Midtown.

Perhaps Martin-Roberts’ appeals to nostalgia and unity will have some takers—and certainly there remains a contingent resentful that Dan Miller did not become mayor three years ago.

But, in the end, most reelection bids are a referendum on the incumbent. Therefore, I expect this campaign to hinge on how folks feel about Eric Papenfuse, especially his strong personality and his governing style. Given his administration’s success in returning a degree of normalcy to the city’s fiscal funhouse, he may have had a pretty easy path to reelection. However, due, at least in part, to his confrontational manner, he’s cracked open a window for his enemies, who now have banded together behind a genial, formidable opponent.

Author: Lawrance Binda

Continue Reading

She’s In: Former City Council President Gloria Martin-Roberts announces bid for Harrisburg Mayor

 

Former Harrisburg City Council President Gloria Martin-Roberts announced her bid for Harrisburg mayor today, saying that she seeks a unified, prosperous city.

Speaking to an enthusiastic crowd of about 100 at the National Civil War Museum, Martin-Roberts said she would seek to build better community relations with the police, support small businesses and encourage home ownership. Her platform, with the slogan of “A City of Unity,” aims to include parts of the city that she said have been left out of Harrisburg’s economic growth.

Gloria Martin Roberts 11.14.16 mayor bid

Former Harrisburg City Council President Gloria Martin-Roberts announced her bid for Harrisburg mayor today.

The Harrisburg native, self-described as “homegrown,” grew up in the Allison Hill and Uptown neighborhoods and graduated from John Harris High School. She said she seeks to serve all of the Harrisburg community.

“I do not have a favorite neighborhood,” she said.

Martin-Roberts retired after two terms on city council in 2011, including one term as council president. In 2012, she ran for 103th seat in the state’s House of Representatives and lost to now-state Rep. Patty Kim. She also served on the city’s school board.

Martin-Roberts took the audience on a trip down memory lane as she recounted local businesses, restaurants and medical offices that have since vanished from Harrisburg with suburbanization. The audience cheered and shouted as Martin-Roberts brought up cherished childhood spots like Martha’s Turntable, the Shake Shop and F&W Fish House.

She called this period “economic development at its best” then added that she doesn’t want to return to the past, but rather return the spirit of the city.

“The common denominator was a city of unity,” she said.

Crowd Gloria Martin Roberts 11.14.16

A crowd of about 100 supporters cheered as she announced her platform.

She praised former Mayor Stephen Reed, with whom she served while on council, for his efforts in rebuilding downtown Harrisburg.

“It was this young man’s vision to rebuild this city,” she said. “Let’s give kudos where kudos is due.”

However, she does not plan to get involved with the school district like Reed did. “I have no desire to take over the Harrisburg School District,” she said to big cheers.

She had some subtle digs at Mayor Eric Papenfuse, repeating that she would engage civilly in disputes. The location itself at the National Civil War Museum held significance, as Papenfuse has repeatedly called for a shutdown of the museum.

She also criticized the fact that the city has hired consultants to create a plan for Reservoir Park and took aim at the bike lane on Front Street, saying it’s “an accident waiting to happen.”

In another rebuke to Papenfuse, she said she would be a “consensus builder,” working closely with such entities as the Dauphin County commissioners, the Harrisburg Chamber & CREDC, the school district and City Council.

“As your mayor, I will be an authentic mayor, a leader who I would want to follow,” she said.

Author: Danielle Roth

Continue Reading

Harrisburg Wants Fighters: Voters sided with reform in City Council election.

While the Harrisburg mayoral race has another leg, barring any atypical occurrence, we  know what the next City Council will look like.

In this Democrat-heavy town, only Democrats have run for council in the past few years, so it’s the primary election that determines the winners and the losers.

This year, there were four seats up for grabs, and of the ten candidates who ran, there were three incumbents—Wanda Williams, Eugenia Smith and Kelly Summerford.

Summerford lost, and two fresh faces were elected to office. In fact, one of those newbies, Shamaine Daniels, garnered more votes than anyone else, which was a surprise to many and, most certainly, to the incumbents.

Aside from the fact that a relatively unfamiliar newcomer succeeded above the rest, it’s worth noting who lost, most especially Summerford, who was considered a Linda Thompson defender and upholder.

When looking back on City Council votes since 2010, when Summerford took office, his voting record indicates an alignment with Thompson and her positions. He was not alone. His comrade was former City Council President Gloria Martin-Roberts. In 2011, she retired from council at the end of her term, choosing no longer to run for local government, but rather tried to make the jump to state. In 2012, she ran for the 103rd PA House of Representatives seat, coming in last in the primary.

She also has stood out as a fervent Thompson supporter.

On the other hand, we have City Council incumbents who have been re-elected. And whether it was this run or the last, what we know is that the “Fabulous Four” made it, while the others have not.

Who are the Fabulous Four?

In a long story made short synopsis….

Back when Linda Thompson was on council, she and Mayor Stephen Reed engaged in a fight about whose right it was to appoint members to the Harrisburg Authority (THA) board—the mayor’s or council’s. The issue headed to the courts, where it went as high as it could. However, there was no final ruling until Thompson defeated Reed and took the office of mayor.

On May 26, 2010—as City Council-appointed members of THA were making progress on the organization of chaotic files and setting terms of negotiations with creditors in the incinerator debt matters—the state Supreme Court came down with its ruling on the matter.

It ruled that the mayor has the right to appoint members to THA’s board, not City Council. Thus, by law, THA’s board was immediately dismantled. Work on a plan to face the incinerator crisis and on a much-discussed forbearance agreement stopped.

Despite a lot of public pressure to do so, Mayor Thompson refused to re-appoint the board members so they could get back to work. It could have been done. The next day. The irony, of course, was that Thompson as city councilor fanatically claimed it was council’s prerogative to appoint the THA board. Hence, the lawsuit with “Linda Thompson” explicitly named as one of the parties involved, meaning she believed so full-heartedly that City Council should appoint the board, not the mayor, that she was willing to spend public money and time to prove her righteousness of principle.

Yet, when the tables turned and she was mayor, instead of returning the council-appointed board back to business, she delayed and then began to send down a list of new candidates who either withdrew themselves before they came before council or caused strife amongst city councilors.

This is the first time we saw the so-called “Fabulous Four,” as the media began to refer to them. There were four members of City Council who stuck together and demanded a re-appointment of the old board—Wanda Williams, Susan Brown-Wilson, Eugenia Smith and Brad Koplinski. They stood strong despite the mayor and City Council President Gloria Martin-Roberts calling them “obstructionists,” “hypocrites” and “children.” This is when Summerford was noted to side with Martin-Roberts and Thompson.

Why does this matter? Because, looking back on that summer of 2010, reflection easily demonstrates how bad of a move it was for Harrisburg to have an inactive THA Board.

It gave creditors power and ultimately contributed to Thompson’s application to the state for the Act 47 program in October 2010, which led to a state takeover and the appointment of a receiver.

The “Fabulous Four” stuck together for a long time. They formed a bloc that voted down various Thompson administration initiatives, including premature asset monetization moves, high-interest financings and the Act 47 program and plans. They even fought receivership and never failed to call Thompson out in unity if there were a questionable claim or deal on the table.

They were publicly applauded. They were voted back into office.

Gloria Martin-Roberts and Kelly Summerford were not. Even Patty Kim, who continuously teetered in the middle of the two sides, won the 103rd seat by a very slim margin.

Apparently, Harrisburg wants fighters. Voters have indicated they want elected officials who seem to understand the complexity of the issues at hand, who have noble opinions and who express perspective for the common good.

The electorate wants representatives to fight the fights that matter the most and not the ones that don’t.

If anything, this election seems to reflect that.

For the two newcomers—Daniels and Ben Allatt—they’ve been given a chance to show who they will listen to and what they’re made of. Clearly, the standard has been set.

Continue Reading