Tag Archives: Vern McKissick

Downtown Harrisburg apartment project gets planning approval, moves next to City Council

A night-time rendering of the proposed Federal Building apartment project (credit: McKissick Associates)

A major downtown Harrisburg apartment project has easily cleared its first significant hurdle, securing an approval of its building plan.

On Wednesday evening, the city’s Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the land development plan for the conversion of the former Federal Building into a 162-unit apartment building.

“I think this is a great project,” said the commission chair, Joe Alsberry. “I do like projects that bring economic development to the city and bring taxpayers to the city. This project appears to be that type of project.”

The vote followed a 30-minute presentation by the New Jersey-based developer, Yasser Hellel, and the project’s Harrisburg-based architect, Vern McKissick, a long-time planning commission member who recused himself from the vote.

Hellel is proposing to construct 146 one-bedroom units, 14 two-bedroom units and two studio units from the 11-story, 196,000-square-foot office building located at N. 3rd and Walnut streets.

The plan also calls for first-floor commercial space and amenities such as a fitness center, penthouse lounge, shared office space, a rooftop deck, a shared lobby and a limited parking deck.

Until recently, the building housed the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and other federal offices. Court personnel moved in April to a new federal courthouse at N. 6th and Reily streets, leaving the building nearly empty.

In February, Hellel bought the 55-year-old structure for $13.3 million from Jeremy Etzin, a former diplomat from the island nation of the Seychelles, who purchased the building at auction a year before for $10 million from the U.S. General Services Administration.

On Wednesday, in an interview with TheBurg, Hellel estimated the total project cost to be around $35 million, including acquisition costs.

A rendering of an apartment interior (credit: McKissick Associates)

During the Planning Commission meeting, Hellel and McKissick addressed two significant issues: parking and affordable housing.

Currently, the project includes only about 30 off-street parking spaces.

Harrisburg’s Downtown Center zoning district does not require off-street parking to be included as part of the project. However, Hellel said that they were seeking to address the issue by possibly leasing spaces in nearby parking garages, with a goal of securing one space per apartment.

“Nothing is approved yet, but we’re really deep into a discussion,” he said. “That’s not only for approval purposes but for practical use of the building.”

Hellel also said that he’s aware of the city’s desire that affordable housing be included in new apartment projects.

“We’re prepared to give some serious consideration as part of our application,” he said. “I think we’ll come up with something sensible to present to City Council. We’re studying the economics of it, and we’ll make something happen.”

Next, the land development plan must go before and be approved by City Council before construction can begin.

Hellel said that he hopes to start work in January and believes that the project will take about 18 months to complete.

During the meeting, McKissick cited the potential effect of the project on the downtown economy, now that many workers who once spent their days in downtown offices work primarily from home. He estimated that the building would house 240 to 280 residents.

“It will be a significant impact and a positive one, we hope,” he said.

Click here to read the city Planning Bureau’s case report for the project.

If you like what we do, please support our work. Become a Friend of TheBurg!

Continue Reading

New Plan: Developer proposes 162 apartments for former Federal Building in Harrisburg

An exterior rendering of the proposed apartment building conversion for the former Federal Building in Harrisburg. (credit: McKissick Associates)

An apartment plan is back on the board for the former Federal Building in downtown Harrisburg, as a developer is proposing an office-to-residential conversion.

Yasser Hellel, a New Jersey-based developer, has submitted a land development plan to convert the boxy, 11-story office structure to a 162-unit apartment building, according to an application filed with the city’s Planning Commission.

The 196,000-square-foot building would include 146 one-bedroom units, 14 two-bedroom units and two studio units, according to the proposal. The units would range in size from 604 to 1,377 square feet.

The plan also calls for possible first-floor commercial space, as well as amenities such as a fitness center, penthouse lounge, shared office space, a rooftop deck, a shared lobby and a parking deck with around 30 spaces.

Notably, Harrisburg’s Downtown Center zoning district does not require developers to include off-street parking in their projects.

A rendering of an apartment (credit: McKissick Associates)

In February, Hellel purchased the 55-year-old structure at N. 3rd and Walnut streets for $13.13 million from Justin Etzin, a former diplomat from the island nation of the Seychelles, who purchased the building at auction in early 2022 from the U.S. General Services Administration for $10 million.

Since 1968, the building had served as the federal government’s main office facility in the Harrisburg area, including housing the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. In April, court employees were officially relocated to the new federal courthouse at N. 6th and Reily streets.

Under his ownership, Etzin twice had informally proposed converting the building to a high-end apartment building, but had never filed a land development plan with the city. Currently, the Harrisburg Planning Commission is slated to consider Hellel’s plan at its meeting on Wednesday.

According to his application, Hellel doesn’t plan to make any changes to the building’s glass-dominant, mid-century design. In fact, it states that he’s currently pursuing an effort to list the building on the National Register of Historic Places, which would help preserve its architectural integrity.

Hellel could not immediately be reached for comment.

A rendering of the rooftop deck (credit: McKissick Associates)

The city’s Planning Bureau has recommended approval of the plan, but has requested that Hellel provide an economic impact report for presentation to City Council.

If the Planning Commission approves the land development plan, council would also need to pass it before work could begin.

In his application, Hellel lists the address of his company, 1422 Route 179 Florida Realty LLC, as located in Old Bridge, N.J.

The main professionals for the project are both Harrisburg-based. They include architect Vern McKissick, a long-time member of the city’s Planning Commission, and Marc Kurowski of Kurowski & Wilson, a city-based engineering firm.

Click here to read the city Planning Bureau’s case report for the project.

If you like what we do, please support our work. Become a Friend of TheBurg!

Continue Reading

Midtown, downtown projects move forward, as Harrisburg Planning Commission gives approvals

Midtown Redevelopment’s project includes an apartment building with a community center (rendering, left)

Several significant Harrisburg building projects cleared hurdles on Wednesday night, earning approvals from the city Planning Commission.

During a virtual meeting, the commission approved variance and special exceptions for three residential projects in Midtown: an apartment building with eight townhouses; a large apartment building with a parking garage; and a small, boutique apartment building. Several other Midtown and downtown projects received land development plan approval.

First, the commission unanimously approved a zoning variance and special exception for a proposal by Midtown Redevelopment LP to build a 12-unit apartment building, along with a community center, on the 1600-block of N. 3rd Street.

The project also includes eight single-family townhouses, with built-in garages, at the rear of the site fronting Logan Street.

Most of the discussion centered around the 18,000-square-foot, three-story apartment building, which would include a mix affordable and market-rate units, according to the company’s partners, Chris and Erica Bryce of Harrisburg and Matt Long, owner of Harrisburg Commercial Interiors.

The building would be built on the site of a long-time community garden, land currently owned by the Harrisburg Redevelopment Authority. The developers said that they would retain the garden but move it to another area nearby. The project also envisions a 4,180-square-foot community center on the first floor of the apartment building.

Long said that the community center idea originated after discussions with the community last year during a neighborhood presentation.

“One of the most recurring themes was that a community center was lacking in Midtown,” he said. “We want to meet the needs of everyone there.”

The developers currently have set aside nine parking spaces on site for the apartment building, but said they would arrange to have parking for each unit. The Logan Street townhouses would be built with their own garage parking.

“Overall, I’m really pleased with the type of residential housing that is being proposed with this application,” said commissioner Anne Marek. “It’s really nice to see a mixture of not just more apartments but also town home development with the garages.”

A rendering of the proposed town homes on Logan Street.

The project now moves to the city’s Zoning Hearing Board for final approval for the variance and special exception. It also must get land development plan approval from both the Planning Commission and City Council.

“I support this project,” said Rich Gribble, a resident who lives nearby on Harris Street. “It looks really exciting to me. And I hope to come up and be a member of the community center.”

 

Reily & Fulton

Next, a development partnership led by Philadelphia-area businessman Kevin Baird presented a large proposed project at Reily and Fulton streets.

This project envisions an 85-unit apartment building, a 500-space parking garage and first-floor retail space on property mostly owned by the Harrisburg Redevelopment Authority.

Under the current configuration, the building would rise seven stories. The apartment portion would include 20 units per floor: six studios, 11 one-bedroom units and three two-bedroom units.

Baird said that the retail portion would be dominated by a grocery store and could also include a restaurant, a café and office space. He added that the parking garage is needed to serve the new federal courthouse a block away, as well as provide parking for the Midtown community.

A rendering of the proposed apartment building and parking garage at Reily and Fulton streets.

The courthouse, at N. 6th and Reily streets, is slated for completion in late 2022, but will have scant parking on site. The federal government anticipates needing more than 500 additional spaces to serve the building.

The developers and commissioners had an extensive discussion about parking legalities, as the site sits within the “no compete” zone under the city’s long-term parking asset lease with the commonwealth.

The developer said that it has an “agreement in principal” with the commonwealth and its asset manager, Trimont, on the issue, which would allow the parking garage to proceed.

“It’s just a question of getting all the stakeholders around the table to agree, and working out the final parts of the agreement,” Baird said. “It’s going to get done.”

The commission approved a variance and special exception for the proposal. This project also now will proceed to the zoning board for final approval and, separately, must have its land development plan approved.

“It’s good to see a project of this quality,” said commissioner Vern McKissick. “It’s definitely what’s happening in other cities around the country.”

 

Carpets & Draperies

Thirdly, the commission approved a variance for the “Carpets and Draperies” building on the 1500-block of N. 3rd Street. City resident Nate Foote has proposed creating a five-unit apartment building from the long vacant, blighted building.

Foote said that other nearby projects, such as those on the planning commission’s agenda on Wednesday night, inspired him to take on the renovation, as he lives in the neighborhood.

“I saw what was happening at the 3rd and Reily corridor and thought it would be a terrible tragedy if this building wasn’t brought back to life at the same time those things were happening,” he said.

A rendering of the 1500-block of N. 3rd Street after the proposed renovation of the “Carpets and Draperies” building

The project does not include parking on site. Foote said that he planned to lease parking in the area, which has several nearby surface lots.

With this approval, Foote likewise now must have the variance approved by the Zoning Hearing Board. The commission on Wednesday also approved the project’s land development plan, which must also be approved by City Council.

Foote mentioned that he’s under some time pressure to have the project approved because his sales contract for the building expires next month.

“I think this is a great project,” said commission Chair Joe Alsberry. “We’ve received a lot of support for it.”

 

Site Plan Approvals

The commission also approved several land development plans by developer Derek Dilks, who plans to convert several small, non-residential buildings to apartments. These are:

* 130 State St., converting an office building to a five-unit apartment building
* 25 N. Front St., converting an office building to an eight-unit apartment building
* 321 N. Front St., converting an office building to a six-unit apartment building
* 260 Boas St., converting the former First United Methodist Church to an eight-unit apartment building

These projects all must be approved by City Council, as well.

Finally, the commission unanimously approved a land development plan to build a mixed-use building downtown at 21 S. 2nd St. A partnership led by Harristown Development plans a six-story building consisting of retail and office space on the bottom two floors, as well as eight apartment units on the upper floors (see exterior rendering).

This site, currently an empty lot, once housed a small, blighted commercial building that included the Coronet restaurant on the first floor. Harristown razed the building after buying it in 2017.

That project also now must get City Council approval before breaking ground.

“We’re excited about the project,” said Brad Jones, Harristown’s president and CEO. “We’re looking forward to doing this new construction here in the next year or so.”

Support quality local journalism. Become a Friend of TheBurg!

Continue Reading

Planning Commission “has not served citizens well” and needs to be replaced, Mayor says.

Concept designs for the city’s Comprehensive Plan, which is currently more than a year behind schedule.

The never-ending story of Harrisburg’s comprehensive planning process could soon be in for a plot twist, if the mayor gets his way with City Council.

Harrisburg Mayor Eric Papenfuse told members of council on Tuesday that he intends to replace all seven members of the city’s Planning Commission, a volunteer board that makes recommendations to council on zoning, land use and other planning matters.

The Planning Commission is also tasked with preparing a comprehensive plan and submitting it to council for approval. It’s been three years since Harrisburg launched its comprehensive planning process, and the project is currently more than a year behind deadline due to disputes between a planning consultant and the city.

Papenfuse blames the Planning Commission for failing to furnish a draft plan for review. His solution is to gradually replace the entire board.

“I do not think the current planning commission has served the citizens well,” Papenfuse said recently. “I can only replace two a year, so it will take four years.”

And that’s only if City Council confirms all of his appointments. Council tabled two of his nominations at Tuesday’s work session: Christopher Nafe, a sustainability manager for the city, and Joseph Link, a former city engineer.

Nafe and Link would replace commissioners Anne Marek and Ronnie Shaeffer, whose terms expire this year, said Planning Commission vice-chair Vern McKissick.

Ausha Green, a council member who also serves on the planning commission, said she recognizes the mayor’s right to nominate board members. However, she is reluctant to bring on new members while the commission is in the process of reviewing and editing the comprehensive plan.

“The timing is not right,” Green said. “More time will be spent bringing someone up to speed rather than getting work done.”

McKissick, who is an architect by trade, agreed that the mayor’s efforts to repopulate the planning commission did not come at a good time.

“It’s ill-advised, but we don’t have a say,” McKissick said.

Council members also bristled at the fact that Papenfuse had picked current and former city employees as his nominees.

Harrisburg City Code allows two city employees to sit on the planning commission. Papenfuse argued that Green, as a council member, counts as one city employee. He believes that appointing another will improve communication between the Planning Commission and the city’s planning bureau.

“The advantage of having another city employee on the commission is that he can actually work with the planning director and has time and expertise to get things done,” Papenfuse said.

Green acknowledged that her role on Planning Commission has led to better communication between City Council and the Planning Commission. She also said she will judge any nominees on their own merit, and won’t discount them if they work for Harrisburg.

But Councilman Cornelius Johnson suggested that Papenfuse’s nominees could create the perception of administrative overreach.

The idea that city officials have tried to wrest control of the comprehensive planning process has permeated much of the discourse about why the project has lagged. Bret Peters, the consultant and lead author of the plan, told TheBurg in December that his relationship with city officials dissolved after they asked him to change recommendations in his draft. They also accused him of failing to pay subcontractors (a charge Peters denies.)

Papenfuse and City Solicitor Neil Grover insist that Peters was fired after submitting material behind deadline last year. Peters says he assiduously followed the terms of his contract but suspended it in 2016, after city administrators allegedly failed to provide timely feedback on drafts.

For his part, Papenfuse rejects the idea that city officials could overstep their role in the planning process.

“The problem with our current Planning Commission is that they see the city as an adversary rather than a collaborator,” Papenfuse said. “This false doctrine… flies in the face of all municipal planning efforts throughout the commonwealth, and is why we don’t have a comprehensive plan yet.”

Even so, Johnson thinks it would be inappropriate to appoint more members of the city’s staff to the Planning Commission. He also said that the commission shouldn’t shoulder all the blame for the delays in the comprehensive planning process.

“The administration played an active role in selecting the [comprehensive plan] consultant, so they share a lot of the responsibility on where our current status is now,” Johnson said. “I think it’s unfair to blame solely the Planning Commission and say they are not doing their job. I don’t think the ultimate answer to solve the problem is to replace everyone.”

The mayor still believes that his nominees will add expertise and a sense of expediency to the volunteer board.

“I tried to suggest two individuals who actually have the time, energy and expertise to roll up their sleeves and get a working draft of a comprehensive plan to City Council,” Papenfuse said. “I’m afraid the current group doesn’t have a clue what they are doing.”

Continue Reading

February News Digest

CRW Releases Infrastructure, Rate Plan

Capital Region Water last month announced plans to spend more than $315 million over the next 20 years upgrading the city’s antiquated sewer system, which will bring Harrisburg into compliance with federal guidelines and carry a cumulative 150 percent increase to water and sewer rates.

Known collectively as the City Beautiful H2O plan, the improvements come following years of deferred maintenance to Harrisburg’s centuries-old combined sewer system. CRW says the updates will reduce sewer discharge into natural waterways, enhance sewer efficiency, and improve neighborhoods through the implementation of green storm water management systems.

The improvements also will significantly raise the rate burden for city households. The draft plan includes an extensive affordability assessment that helped CRW set rate projections for the duration of the project. The analysis concluded that many CRW ratepayers have significant financial limitations that preclude aggressive rate hikes.

As a result, CRW decided to seek the lengthiest improvement schedule permitted by federal environmental agencies, giving the authority 20 years to complete the projects. Water and sewage rates are set to increase by a cumulative 150 percent over that time period.

The rate increases will be most dramatic in the next decade, with annual 10 percent hikes projected from 2019 to 2022. After reaching a 106-percent cumulative increase in 2027, rate hikes will level off to just 2 percent a year from 2027 to 2038.

CRW set rates so that an average household will not spend more than 2 percent of its annual income on water, but households earning less than the median income could face significant burdens

“It is anticipated that there will still be affordability issues for some customers within the City, with some customers experiencing wastewater and storm water costs as a percentage of income exceeding 3.0 percent,” the report says.

The draft plan is part of CRW’s response to a partial consent decree it negotiated with the U.S. Department of Environmental Protection in late 2014. Earlier that year, the EPA alleged that sewage runoff in Harrisburg violated the federal Clean Water Act and PA Clean Streams Law.

Like many old cities, Harrisburg has a combined sewer system, in which storm drains connect to the same sewer system as toilets and showers.

When it’s not raining, all the contents of the sewer system flow to a treatment plant on Cameron Street, where they are cleaned and then discharged into the Susquehanna River. But heavy rain can cause the system to overflow, sending untreated water into the river and Paxton Creek.

Under state and federal environmental laws, Harrisburg would have faced financial penalties for those runoff incidents. After a year of negotiations, the EPA agreed to spare the city financial penalties as long as CRW agreed to update its long-term plan for the city’s sewer system.

A public meeting on the proposal is slated for March 1, 6 to 8 p.m., at the Camp Curtin YMCA.


Fight Against Dogfighting

Citing concerns over animal welfare and illegal gambling, Harrisburg is asking its residents to help stop a scourge of illegal dogfighting.

City communications Director Joyce Davis announced last month that Harrisburg obtained a $20,000 grant from the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board to launch a public information campaign about dogfighting. So far, city officials have purchased ads on Facebook that explain the warning signs of dogfighting and ways to report it to law enforcement.

Davis said that the campaign did not arise as a response to a single incident or spate of reports. Rather, it seeks to curb an on-going animal abuse problem that also enables illegal gambling.

“We want to stamp this out,” she said.

The issue of dogfighting came to the fore locally in June 2017, when Harrisburg police officers staged a raid on a dogfighting ring on S. 14th Street. Since then, the bureau has issued charges on three counts of illegal dogfighting in the past year, as well as one count of possession of dogfighting paraphernalia, according to animal control officer William Sandstrom.

If city residents suspect dogfighting, they can call 311 from within city limits to report it. Reports that result in charges are eligible for a $5,000 reward from the Humane Society of the United States.


Zembo Shrine to Sell

The historic Zembo Mosque and Shrine is set to sell after almost one year on the market.

The 65,000-square-foot property at Division and N. 3rd streets will be sold to Arkansas-based TempleLive LLC, which plans to operate the building as a meeting, gathering and performing arts venue, said city communications Director Joyce Davis.

“The goal is to make it a more culturally active space,” Davis said

TempleLive currently owns two Masonic temples similar to Zembo, one in Cleveland and one in Fort Smith, Ark. The company runs both properties as multi-purpose event spaces, according to the venues’ websites.

Mike Brown, vice president of acquisitions for Beaty Capital Group, TempleLive’s parent company, expects the sale to close at the end of March or beginning of April. He hopes the site will be operational by the fall.

Zembo went on the market in February 2017 with a $950,000 asking price. Davis could not confirm the property’s final sale price, which was reportedly reached at a special meeting on Jan. 11.

The deal includes 396 parking spaces adjacent to the building.

Since its opening, Zembo has been home to the Shriners, a fraternal organization affiliated with the Freemasons. The Shriners continue to meet there, but the group’s declining membership, coupled with the building’s high operating costs, forced them to sell the historic property.

Zembo was constructed in 1930 in a Moorish Revival architectural style. The building features interior arches, hand-painted motifs and ornate stone detailing. It houses large meeting rooms and a theater with a 2,500-seat capacity.

Youth Center Approved

The Harrisburg City Council last month approved the expansion of a teen center in North Allison Hill, which will double the facility in size.

Bethesda Mission plans to renovate an old printing plant on Herr Street adjacent to its current Youth Center, adding a full-size gymnasium, classrooms, office space and an event hall with a full-service kitchen.

The result will be a full-service community center with classes and amenities for all age groups, said Cindy Mallow, director of development at Bethesda Mission. The current youth center only serves children and teens.

“We’re hoping to involve families and expand out into the community even more,” Mallow said.

Bethesda Mission hopes to break ground on the $2.8 million project this summer and finish it by the end of 2018, Mallow said.

Bethesda Mission has operated its teen center from a former fire station at 1428 Herr St. since 1990. It purchased the former Kurzenkabe Press facility at 1424 Herr for $275,000 in 2015, according to Dauphin County property records.

The 10,000-square-foot space needs extensive renovations, Mallow said, including an overhaul of its HVAC, plumbing and electrical systems. Contractors will also raise the ceilings to accommodate the gymnasium and construct a connection between the print facility and the youth center.

Since Bethesda Mission announced its plan to renovate the printing facility back in 2015, it has raised more than $1.5 million from the community and private foundations, including $600,000 from the York-based Stabler Foundation.

The expansion will also allow the mission to double or triple the enrollment in its after-school program and summer programs for youth, Mallow said.

“There’s just a need for a place for the kids to go,” she said. “Our center gives them the opportunity to be with other kids and have a mentor.”

 

Grant Input Sought

Is there a nonprofit that’s doing good in your neighborhood?

That’s one of the questions that city administrators will pose at a public meeting this month, as Harrisburg begins to chart its priorities for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) money over the next five years.

CDBG funds are allocated annually to organizations that help build community and stabilize neighborhoods in low- and moderate-income areas. The city received $1.9 million last year and expects the same this year, according to city communications Director Joyce Davis.

The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which disburses CDBG money, requires each municipality receiving grants to have a “consolidated plan” describing its development priorities and goals.

Harrisburg’s current three-year plan is set to expire in September. Roy Christ, Harrisburg’s director of Building and Housing, said that development projects started during Mayor Eric Papenfuse’s first term require a new plan with a longer duration.

In past years, CDBG funds have supported organizations such as the Heinz-Menaker Senior Center, Habitat for Humanity of Greater Harrisburg, the Latino Hispanic American Community Center and MidPenn Legal Services.

City departments can also apply for grants. Last year, the Harrisburg Police Bureau received $90,000, which paid for a community policing van and helped launch the police cadet program.

For this planning cycle, Christ said Harrisburg hopes to target projects in “tipping point” neighborhoods.

“These are neighborhoods that need a bit of help to bounce back and become self-sustaining,” he said.

City residents can contribute input at the public meeting or through an online survey. The meeting will be held on March 5 at Jackson-Lick Tower at 5:30 p.m.

Strawberry Square Apartments

Harrisburg City Council last month gave the green light to another set of apartments inside Strawberry Square.

Council unanimously approved a land development plan submitted by Brad Jones, CEO of Harristown Enterprises, which will convert vacant office space in Strawberry Square into 13 apartment units. The project will add to the 24 apartments already inside Strawberry Square, the result of a 2016 office-to-residential conversion by Harristown.

It’s also the third project that Jones has put before council just this year, as, in January, council approved two other downtown projects proposed by Harristown: a new office building on S. 2nd Street just off Market Square and a small office-to-residential conversion at 221 N. 2nd St.

Approval came despite recent statements from some council members that they are concerned about affordable housing in the downtown district.

Earlier in the month, Jones defended his pricing structure, telling council that 15 percent of Harristown’s apartment units could be rented by someone with an annual income of just $25,000 to $40,000 a year, while another 40 percent could be afforded by someone with an average income of $60,000 a year.

Council has not proposed any plans to regulate rents in Harrisburg. In January, however, council President Wanda Williams said that she would continue to monitor housing development and advocate for affordable options.

Comp Plan Chugs Forward

The Harrisburg Planning Commission last month made plans to advance the city’s comprehensive plan towards completion, a process that could last into the summer.

City officials and business developers excoriated the plan at a meeting in January, saying it limited the discretion of private property owners. Mayor Eric Papenfuse called the document “unsalvageable” and urged the commission to reject it in favor of a plan proposed by the city.

Last month, though, commissioners hardly mentioned the planning document submitted by the city, except to ask if and when it had been published online.

“We’re moving ahead with our product,” said commissioner Vern McKissick, referring to the document that the commission developed with local architect Bret Peters and his assistants at the Harrisburg-based Office for Planning and Architecture.

The commission will host monthly workshop meetings for the next three months to incorporate public feedback and professional advice into the draft document, which is published online at BeHBG.org. They hope to reengage some of the consultants that Peters hired while drafting the plan in 2015 and 2016.

To do that, however, they’ll need to secure additional funding. They already have $10,000 allotted by City Council in the 2018 city budget, but McKissick said they will likely need more to consult with subcontractors and see the plan to completion. Commissioners will evaluate grants and other funding opportunities at a workshop later this month.

Spradley Chosen for School Board

The Harrisburg school board last month selected Tyrell Spradley, a tax consultant and former city treasurer, to serve an appointed term until 2019.

Spradley replaced Matt Krupp, a board director who resigned in January to serve as Dauphin County prothonotary.

After two rounds of voting, the board picked Spradley over three other candidates: newcomer Mariah Rodriguez and board veterans James Thompson and Kia Hansard.

In his interview before the board, Spradley touted his financial background and his two years of experience working in the district’s accounting department. He said he thinks many of the issues facing the district can be resolved, given the improved fiscal health he has seen since he worked as a district accountant.

“A lot of the issues I see are administrative issues, communication,” Spradley said. “Money isn’t a problem like it was before. We’re stronger now and have a stronger administration.”

Spradley joins the board as it braces for a number of contentious discussions, including the annual budget process and the expiration of Superintendent Sybil Knight-Burney’s contract this June. The board must decide soon whether it will renew Knight-Burney’s contract or open an application process in which she may participate.

So Noted

AAA Central Penn
last month named Jodie Daubert as its new president and CEO. In this position, Daubert will lead the nine-county club composed of 290 employees serving 11 offices. She succeeds David Meckley, who served as interim CEO. 

Brandalynn Armstrong, co-owner of Harrisburg-based Zeroday Brewing Co., has been elected to the Brewers of Pennsylvania board of directors. The trade association works to protect and promote the brewing industry in the state.

Excel Interior Concepts & Construction last month announced two new hires. Thomas Fogie joined the Lemoyne-based company as project coordinator, and Alicia Mirando came on as designer.

The Harrisburg Senators last month signed a two-year extension with the Washington Nationals, their player development agreement now extending through 2020. The Senators are the Nationals’ AA-affiliate Minor League baseball team. Separately, the Senators announced that Dan and Michael Schwab, co-presidents of Harrisburg-based D&H Distributing, along with their sister, Amy Silfen, have joined the team’s ownership group as minority owners.

S&T Bank has named Jeffrey Scoutelas as vice president, private banker for central Pennsylvania region. Scoutelas, a graduate of Lynchburg College, has 12 years of private banking and management experience in the area, said the company.

Changing Hands

Berryhill St., 2155: L. & D. Sandoe to M. Macas & C. Pulla, $55,500

Boas St., 1826: Z. Weist to S. Henry, $59,900

Brookwood St., 2448: Wilmington Savings Fund Society to HT Properties LLC, $35,500

Capital St., 907: A. Sheaf to E. Ashenfelder, $148,000

Capital St., 1200: 8219 Ventures to R. & C. Steele, $76,000

Croyden Rd., 2951: K. & M. Zinn to A. Smith, $70,000

Derry St., 1433: A. Vaughn to Aum Investments LP, $32,000

Derry St., 1901: L. Nguyen to T. Nguyen, $150,000

Derry St., 2022: M. Khatoon to A. Saeed, $30,000

Emerald St., 226: C. Shokes to HBG Rents LLC, $210,000

Forster St., 1815: Blackscotch LLC to C. Burke, $50,000

Green St., 914: P. Vanitem to C. Williams, $138,900

Green St., 1401½: C. & C. Kellar to R. & F. Armetta, $80,000

Green St., 1623: S. Vemula & M. Chada to B. Golper & J. Wu, $132,000

Green St., 3118: US Bank NA Trustee & PA Housing Finance Agency to Hawk Vesta LLC, $65,750

Hale Ave., 436: M. Davis to J. Sayed & S. Sherin, $40,000

Hanna St., 103: S. Brown to DLK Properties LLC, $63,500

Harris St., 434: Alta Reo LLC to B. Parfitt, $83,000

Herr St., 1001: Harsco Corp. to Capital Region Economic Development Corp., $505,000

Hanover St., 1312 and 1283 & 1285 S. 13th St.: Y. & C. Lee to D&F Realty Holdings LP, $50,000

Hoffman St., 3131: G. Hanslovan to O. Perry, $63,000

James St., 1315: J. Brinks & C. Wise to S., J. & N. Kindler, $95,000

Kensington St., 2101: Nationstar Mortgage LLC to HT Properties LLC, $48,500

Kensington St., 2103: PA Deals LLC to L. Myers, $65,900

Lawton St., 1416: M. Maloney to J. Foote & R. Tompkins, $429,500

Luce St., 2365: T. Nguyen & H. Truong to M. Phan, $30,000

Maclay St., 332: S. Hite & L. Ware Jr. to JTA Consulting Group LLC, $51,000

North St., 1836 & 1838: Reyart Properties to B. & R. Lomax, $72,000

N. 2nd St., 1404: Tang Liu Realty LLC to C. Albers, $121,000

N. 2nd St., 2323: M. Horgan & CR Services Inc. to A. & A. Mathew, $147,500

N. 2nd St., 3118: P. & M. Rowan to D. Inghilterra, $203,000

N. 2nd St., 3303: C. Myers to J. Myers, $90,000

N. 4th St., 2735: S. Patrick to T. & L. Lydell, $107,900

N. 6th St., 3111: R. & S. Hopkins to C. Morel, $62,000

N. 13th St., 142: J. Forsyth LLC to 37 Estate LLC, $41,000

N. Front St., 1125: D. & J. McEnany to RMK Management Group LLC, $233,000

N. Front St., 1525, Unit 301: W. Cohen to W. Krenz & P. Meehan, $135,000

N. Front St., 3029: Pumphouse Partners LP to BXF Real Estate LLC, $450,000

Penn St., 1324: D. Stridacchio to S. Olsen, $117,000

Penn St., 1715: BencMarq Holdings LLC to Fratelli Property Investments LLC, $116,000

Race St., 568: R. Hunter to E. Fultz, $157,968

Rolleston St., 1239: G. Neff to J. McCloud, $45,000

Seneca St., 330: J. Runion to M. Saldana & R. Zavala, $87,500

S. 14th St., 1418: R. Scott to City of Harrisburg, $52,000

S. 14th St., 1422: G. Neff to City of Harrisburg, $48,500

S. 14th St., 1424: C. Gamble to City of Harrisburg, $45,000

S. 14th St., 1433: Z. Owens to City of Harrisburg, $51,000

S. 14th St., 1440: G. Neff to City of Harrisburg, $51,000

S. 19th St., 850: S. & N. Fulginiti to City of Harrisburg, $60,000

S. 23rd St., 616: R. Bowers to D. & N. Gonzalez, $89,900

S. Front St., 601: A. Poindexter to R. & L. Firestone, $174,900

State St., 1504: A. Sandoval to 77 Estate LLC, $37,000

Susquehanna St., 1612: K. O’Neill & PA Housing Finance Agency to T. Weaver, $146,500

Susquehanna St., 1723: G. Neff to J. Hirt, $104,000

Valley Rd., 2308: L. & N. Eikenberry to Bean GST Trust II, $218,000

Washington St., 103: R. Bray to Q. Tran, $32,000

Continue Reading

Moving Ahead: Despite criticism, HBG Planning Commission sticks with comprehensive plan draft.

Pages from the proposed comprehensive plan.

The Harrisburg Planning Commission tonight made plans to advance the city’s comprehensive plan towards completion, a process that could last into the summer.

The commission’s meeting tonight was its first since it held a public hearing on the comprehensive plan in January. City officials and business developers excoriated the plan at that meeting, saying it limited the discretion of private property owners. Mayor Eric Papenfuse called the document “unsalvageable” and urged the commission to reject it in favor of a plan proposed by the city.

This evening, commissioners hardly mentioned the planning document submitted by the city, except to ask if and when it had been published online.

“We’re moving ahead with our product,” said commissioner Vern McKissick, referring to the document that the commission developed with local architect Bret Peters and his assistants at the Harrisburg-based Office for Planning and Architecture.

The commission will host monthly workshop meetings for the next three months to incorporate public feedback and professional advice into the draft document, which is published online at BeHBG.org. They hope to reengage some of the consultants that Peters hired while drafting the document in 2015 and 2016.

To do that, however, they’ll need to secure additional funding. They already have $10,000 allotted by City Council in the 2018 city budget, but McKissick said they will likely need more to consult with subcontractors and see the plan to completion. Commissioners will evaluate grants and other funding opportunities at a workshop later this month.

Commissioners are also waiting on legal representation to determine the standing between the city and Peters, who sparred about payments and deadlines while the plan was being drafted. Peters maintains that he suspended the contract, but city Solicitor Neil Grover has insisted that it was terminated after he failed to uphold his terms. McKissick said that a city-appointed attorney appeared before the commission once last year, but he hopes to find other representation in the coming months.

McKissick wasn’t sure how long it would take to edit the document and submit it to council for final approval. Commissioners will rely on comments from the January public hearing to edit the document, as well as feedback submitted via the BeHbg website. They reported tonight that correspondence from residents about the plan was scant.

Continue Reading

Not Our Fault? In Harrisburg, there’s plenty of blame to go around.

Screenshot 2015-06-01 08.14.19I don’t often get into screaming matches, much less in public places.

But, a pint or two in at my favorite new Harrisburg brewery, a friend and I began raising our voices over something we actually agree about—that we’re both angry, really angry, at John Campbell.

For sure, we’re not alone. The disgraced former Harrisburg treasurer upset plenty of people who had trusted him with their confidence and their money.

Heck, two months before Campbell’s arrest on theft charges, TheBurg helped host a party in his honor as he departed Historic Harrisburg Association, where he had been executive director. And my friend and I both were members of organizations where Campbell has been accused of taking money.

So, I guess we needed to vent, which we did, loudly, in contrast to the sounds of folks happily enjoying their La Dolce Vita drafts and their mutual company and the din of the jukebox at Zeroday Brewing.

We vocally debated Harrisburg’s version of “he who must not be named,” but, in the process, disagreed about something fundamental.

I hold many of us at least partially responsible for the phenomenon that was John Campbell; my friend doesn’t.

“He was a con man,” my friend said. “How could anyone have known that?”

Con man, no doubt. But I insisted that Campbell never should have had such positions of authority in the first place.

“He was a 21-year-old kid still in college when he was hired,” I countered, insisting (without success) that Campbell should have been flagged as too young and too inexperienced to serve as director or treasurer of anything important.

A person, I believe, is responsible for his own actions. However, that also pertains to the supporting actors, those who played lesser parts in a situation that goes spectacularly wrong.

I feel largely the same way about the city’s financial collapse.

Former Mayor Steve Reed, without question, tops the list of people responsible for Harrisburg’s fiscal chaos. However, in a flow chart of blame, you could list, in descending order, Reed’s direct underlings; the professionals who advised him; the Harrisburg Authority; members of City Council; the Dauphin County commissioners; numerous state officials; the supine media; and the voters.

Not that anybody has accepted this blame. A few years back, during a state Senate committee hearing on the city’s massive incinerator debt, every witness called upon, including Reed himself, denied responsibility. Evidently, Harrisburg’s near-bankruptcy happened without anyone causing it.

In fact, during the Reed administration, signals abounded that his consolidation of power was troubling and that the city’s finances were increasingly out-of-whack. Some residents tried to sound the alarm, but they invariably were shouted down, mocked or ignored.

You could make a long list of the ill-advised projects that the Reed administration championed, often financing them through strange, convoluted deals. For the sake of this column, I’ll limit my focus to what might be the most surreal—Reed’s attempt to build not one, but “five nationally scaled museums” (his words) in a poor, tiny city in central Pennsylvania.

New museums typically are born in one of two ways. In the first, a group (usually a non-profit board) tries to raise money for a building and/or its contents. In the second, a wealthy patron donates items—and sometimes foots the bill for the building, as well.

Harrisburg didn’t follow either path. The museum idea originated in the mind of a single man, Steve Reed, without any of the detailed preparation and painstaking planning needed to embark on a massive venture like starting a world-class museum (much less five of them).

In a nutshell, Reed got hold of public money and began buying stuff because he wanted to—and because he could.

Over a decade, he packed an enormous warehouse (and several other buildings) full of thousands of items from his sprees, spending untold millions on things that ranged from the genuine and valuable to junk and fakes. Lacking expertise, he vacuumed up lot after lot, often overpaying for the good and the bad.

The majority of objects were for an Old West museum he wanted to build, but some were for an African-American heritage museum he proposed and others for a Sports Hall of Fame he hoped to construct on City Island. There also were artifacts that didn’t seem to fit into any category—wood from a Colonial-era ship, transcripts from the Nuremberg trials.

Eventually, he got one “nationally scaled” museum built, the National Civil War Museum, but only because he learned that former Gov. Tom Ridge was a Civil War buff. So, according to project architect Vern McKissick, Reed quickly carved out a Civil War collection from his vast Old West stash and, though luck and salesmanship, got the state to foot the bill for the building.

This is local government gone completely off the rails. I half-laugh, half-cringe when I imagine Reed and his surrogates darting around the country attending auctions, sweeping up inventory, packing it all up, shipping it to Harrisburg, unpacking it and storing it in whatever dusty corner they could find for future museums that had no realistic path to ever existing.

But that’s what happened, and a lot of people knew about it—officials and politicians, consultants, city workers, the media, some in the general public. Yet year after year after year, it went on.

Typically, I’m not big on assigning blame, as I find resolving a problem more important than determining who’s at fault. However, in the case of Campbell and Reed, I believe it’s important to examine if we, as individuals, are in some way responsible. By understanding our own roles, we lessen the chance of a future rogue mayor, thieving treasurer or whoever might try to scam us next.

We all know the cliché that it takes a village to accomplish something good. Well, sometimes, it also takes a village to screw up royally.

 

 

Lawrance Binda is editor-in-chief of TheBurg.

Continue Reading

TheBurg Podcast, April 3, 2015

Welcome to TheBurg Podcast, a weekly roundup of news in and around Harrisburg.

April 3, 2015: This week, Larry and Paul discuss the best-laid plans of mice and men and how they fared at the planning commission. Specifically, they talk about a proposal for a 160-foot office tower on the riverfront and the demolition of two historic clapboard houses on Locust Street, an exemption for a so-called “nanobrewery” and a switch in the downtown real estate market from commercial to residential.

Special thanks to Paul Cooley, who wrote our theme. You can listen to his podcast, the PRC Show, on SoundCloud or in the iTunes Store.

TheBurg Podcast can be downloaded by clicking on the date above or by visiting the iTunes store. You can also access the podcast via its host page, here.

Continue Reading

Living Downtown: More Residential Planned for Harrisburg

StrawberrySquare

The upper floors of these historic buildings would be converted from office to residential under a proposal by Harristown.

Strawberry Square took the first step in a new direction last night, as the city Planning Commission gave its blessing to a proposed conversion of office space to residential units at the intersection of 3rd and Market streets downtown.

The plan would create six two-bedroom and 16 one-bedroom units on two floors above a stretch of shops along 3rd Street between Strawberry and Market and along Market near the corner with 3rd.

Under the proposal, 21,000 square feet currently used as office space would be converted to residential apartments, along with 6,000 square feet of loft space.

If all goes according to plan, work on the project would begin this fall with completion slated for spring 2016, said Brad Jones, president and CEO of Harristown Enterprises, which owns Strawberry Square.

City approval for the project was required almost as a technicality, as multi-family dwelling units are permitted by right in the downtown center zone. But the code requires a hearing on renovations exceeding 10,000 square feet and involving a change of use, city planners said.

The planning commission’s Vern McKissick noted that, in fact, the conversion would likely restore the property to a prior use, as the units above downtown shops were traditionally shop owners’ residences.

“It seems you’re actually going back to the past,” McKissick said.

Jones agreed, saying that several of the existing office units had fireplaces and natural light better suited to residential use. The plan would not alter the exterior of the buildings, he said.

Harristown’s project would be the latest to convert office to residential space downtown. Over the past year, WCI Partners, Brickbox Enterprises and Vartan Group all have created multi-family dwellings from timeworn downtown office buildings. In June, WCI will debut Walnut Court, a 21-unit apartment building that long housed a law firm at the corner of Walnut and Court streets.

Jones said that Harristown’s market research showed reduced demand for office space and increasing demand for residential units downtown. He also noted that additional parking would not be needed for any new residents, as the Strawberry Square complex has ample spaces available in its garage.

The working title for the apartments is “Flats at Strawberry Square,” Jones said. He said the new units are expected to rent for $800 to $1,300 per month.

Continue Reading

The Rebuilders: A Q&A with Vern McKissick

Vern McKissick

Vern McKissick

This month, TheBurg introduces “The Rebuilders,” an occasional series of interviews with people who have contributed to the reconstruction of the city.

Our first interview is with Vern McKissick, founder of McKissick Associates Architects. McKissick has designed several important buildings in Harrisburg, including the National Civil War Museum and, more recently, the Capitol View Commerce Center. We sat down to talk in the building where he works and lives at 317 N. Front St. The complete interview follows.

 

TheBurg: Tell me a bit about your background.

My wife and I moved here in ’93. Interestingly enough, we tried to buy this building. I was with an architecture firm that was two doors up the street. They had purchased the old Lawrie and Green. Lawrie and Green locally had done the State Museum, the YWCA, the courthouse, Strawberry Square, you name it.

So, it was kind of intriguing. We were in the State College area, moved down. When we decided to move, we expected to be dead in six months.

 

TheBurg: Why was that?

My earliest memories—my father was a school superintendent and, in those days, before computers, they would have them all come down here every month or two months for meetings at the Department of Ed. And, sometimes, we’d come down with my mother, and one of my earliest memories was being hunkered down on what I now know to be 2nd Street outside of what was then the Harris Savings Bank while the cops were leaning over the back of the car during a bank robbery. So, this was my sense of Harrisburg (laughs). This was in the ‘70s. So, I thought, well, OK, we’ll go down there and be dead in six months.

 

TheBurg: A lot of people still think that, and I continually write about how ridiculous this is.

That’s like my mother-in-law because when we first moved down, our home sale fell through at the last minute in Boalsburg. They wanted me down here at the office, so we took the caretaker’s place two doors up the street for about five months downtown. And her mother was convinced we would be dead. She begged me not to do this. So, that was my introduction to Front Street.

 

TheBurg: You didn’t die, as it turned out.

Apparently not.

We tried to buy this building. It was abandoned at the time. The homeless were living in it. It was placarded for demolition. We tried to buy it, and they turned down our offer. So, we went up to Bellevue Park and bought a place up there and lived there for awhile.

 

TheBurg: You tried to buy it as your home?

Yes, we tried to buy it as our home back then. My office was two doors up the street, so I watched it. And I saw the fires that happened here and all the things. So, it was kind of disappointing for years and years and, finally, in ’99, [former Lieut. Gov.] Mark Singel bought this place and started renovating it. So, when we had a chance in 2003, we met him, we said, “Hey, I’ll finish it. Let me take it over from you.” But it took us years to get here.

We’ve been on Front Street . . . my office was there when we started the new practice. We were with Hayes Large Architects. I was one of five partners. We were eight offices and 180 people and an airplane and all the rest of that jazz—very high corporate, tightly wound kind of a place. We wanted to do something different.

My wife is an architect by training. We met at Penn State. She left the firm. When she wanted to become a partner, they said, “Oh, well you shouldn’t be a wife or kin.” So, she stated a small graphics company and ended up morphing into a commitment where she was the initial webmaster for MapQuest down in Lancaster. So, when MapQuest in ’99, when AOL bought them out for $1 billion, we cashed the stock options and said, “You know, I really don’t need all this headache. Let’s do something on our own.” So, we walked down the street and leased an office in a historic building of St. Stephen’s. So, we’re back down on Front Street. My mother-in-law still expected us to be dead in six months. I’ve had 20 years on Front Street at this point.

It’s the greatest place to be in the world. There’s no place better I’ve been—the view and the park and the activities and the fireworks. And I can walk to a hardware store, and I can walk to the bank, and I walk to my accountant. It’s just bizarre. It’s like a small town, but it isn’t. So, we see a lot of things being down here. I probably have one of the most prolific numbers on 9-1-1. Other people just look past it, but I call. They say, “Oh, it’s you again. What is it this time?” But we have a responsibility, and I try to live up to it.”

But we’ve never had a problem in all the years. You just live smart. You don’t do stupid stuff—stagger around drunk at 2 in the morning. I don’t care if you’re in State College or Boston, you’re going to have a problem.

I’ve become a real big booster on Harrisburg. Once you get off the beltway and see that there’s actually an old city underneath, it’s got a lot of charm and a lot of potential. We’re both from small towns. So, we found that actually Harrisburg, once you get into it, is a lot like that. There’s only—there’s a small group of very active people, and you can get to know who they are. And it’s very transient because people do come into the area, it’s not like going to Pittsburgh, where, if you’re not a Mellon or a five-generation family, you can’t get involved or do things.

We do a lot of work out of the area because there’s just not much happening in Harrisburg per se. We’re out in Johnstown and Erie and Pittsburgh, and we have an office and home down in Winston-Salem, N.C., which is interesting for us because it’s the same size metropolitan area. It had the same kind of challenge because RJR shut down. But their response to it is a $1 billion in infrastructure improvement, and they now have a biotechnology center, a medical school downtown, 10,000 new residents and loft apartments that have been converted from the old warehouses and things. And it’s just interesting to see how two different communities dealt with adversity. If the state left [Harrisburg] tomorrow, I don’t know what we’d do. I just can’t imagine anyone having the vision to do anything with it. But, along the way, I had the chance to do the Civil War Museum with [former mayor] Steve Reed, back in the day, and that was very interesting. View from the inside-out.

 

TheBurg: I bet it was.

We reopened Pennsylvania Place when it was abandoned. We worked with that one. We did St. Stephen’s, converted the old parking garage into the first LEED-rated religious school in the country, which is kind of neat, taking an 1845 mansion and a 1922 parking garage and saying we’ll make a school out of it. There have been some challenges. But, like I say, we mostly work in small towns: Wellsboro and Williamsport and Sunbury and Milton and Selinsgrove and Bedford.

 

TheBurg: What was your first significant project in Harrisburg?

Our first significant project in the city was the Civil War Museum. We moved here in ’93, still did a lot of work in New York and Virginia. But that was interesting. It was a design competition, and we were short-listed as one of three, and Steve Reed had very definite ideas on what he thought the solution should be.

 

TheBurg: That’s not surprising.

It was his solution, and, basically, it was a small building down by the amphitheater. We came up with some illuminated, like kind of tents. It looked like an encampment type of thing. I didn’t like it. So, we had a model about half the size of this table. I said, “You know, I’m going to win this thing.” So, we built the model so that the top lifted up. It was the whole Reservoir Park. At the time, there was a circle at the top of the hill, where everyone used to go to drain their motor oil. People were upset because we took away the drains where they had drained their oil into. It was a great mix with the reservoirs being up there.

When we got down, I said, “Do you have five more minutes?” He said, “Yeah, all right.” I had staged four people in the next room, and I had them come in. They came in and lifted the top of the model off, walked out of the room, brought in a model to put the building on top of the hill, used the circumference of the old drive as the circle for the atrium. Reed took a look at it and said, “That doesn’t match anything I asked you for. I love it.” It goes back to the fact that nobody knows what they want until they see it sometimes.

So, we got to work on that project over the years. It was interesting because when we first started working on it, we had a budget of $6 million. He said, “That’s not big enough. How big do you want it?” He said, “What if I give you another $1 million?” He came back. “That’s still not big enough. What if I gave you $2 more million?” It finally got big enough at like 16. I said, “OK.”

The most amazing thing with that project was the day I had to tell him it was in Susquehanna Township. Everyone in the city had thought, until that time, that Reservoir Park was in the city. Actually, two-thirds of it is in Susquehanna Township. So, Steve got a little worked up and had a bit of a panic attack. We started to look at other sites, like down at where the post office is here. We were moving the museum there. I took it upon myself to call the supervisor of Susquehanna Township and said, “Can I come and meet with you?” I’m not authorized to do this. I went into them and talked and explained what we were doing. At the end of the day, they said, “You know what: as long as you redirect all the water into the city, the storm water into the city, you close all the roads that connect to our township coming out of the park, we’ll waive all of our land development rights and give everything back to the city, and you do whatever you want.”

So, I walked back to Steve Reed and said, “Guess what I just figured out?” He said, “You did what? Oh, I guess we could do that.” But, until then, the project was cancelled. It couldn’t be there because it was in the township. So that was a fun project. Then we documented the construction and did the brochures when it opened. They hadn’t thought about the fact they needed printed material and so on and so forth when they opened. So, we found a printer a week before it was due to open. We picked up the brochures wet from the printer, folded them in the back of car in my tux and her gown, just so there would be something in there when it opened. It went on. We did the business plan. We did all the curatorial stuff. So, I touched everything that was in it.

And I could have told you that two-thirds of the stuff was Western, because he was doing a Western museum until he found out that [former Gov.] Ridge liked Civil War. So, [Reed] just said, “I’ll just take this chunk of my history, which together was 1800 to 1890 or whatever, and I’ll make that a separate museum.”

So, we brought in the folks from the Tennessee State Museum, their director. We brought in grad students in curatorial studies to separate everything out, and we set up this big room at the sewage treatment plant, of all places, about the size of a gymnasium. And we put a rope down the middle, and then we started bringing in all this stuff from all the rooms, all over the city, because all we had was a list. We had no idea what we had. So, you’d open the boxes. By the time we were done, we had pushed the aisle all the way over here, because we had this much Civil War and this much Western stuff. So, it was just an amazing view for me on the inside of all of that.

 

TheBurg: His original plan was the Wild West Museum?

That was his passion. The Civil War was just a breakout. And one of the frustrating things with the Civil War Museum was—and I appreciate what Eric is trying to do over here—but when the first reaction was, “Well, we’re not getting our money’s worth out of the museum,” the reality was the state paid for the entire museum. Even though it was a $34 million project, the other $17 million was all pledged value of the park. The Parking Authority actually built all the roads and the parking lot. So, there is no cash value to the city in the building. So, the city is not paying. It’s not out anything.

 

TheBurg: It’s on the hook to maintain the building.

But my sense, mostly they’ve been doing their own maintenance. I mean, the city never really stepped up.

 

TheBurg: They want to bill the city for some of their maintenance.

And that was the original agreement. What was interesting was we did the financial analysis, and what actually happened was exactly what was predicted. We had to go into the governor’s office, and we presented all the data. We predicted it would be, I think, 119,000 visitors and it would drop to 80 and 69, and it would stabilize to around 43,000 over time. We’ve actually stabilized a couple thousand higher than that, which is exactly what we thought.

The whole thing was designed as an event location. That’s why so much focus was on the ballroom and all the rest of it, because we knew it would never do more than 25 percent of its money from gate receipts.

We had good people [working on the museum]. We had Avi Decter help us with the exhibit design. He had just finished the Holocaust Museum in DC. We brought in Ueland Junker Nicholson out of Philly. They did they Constitution Center as our equipment and our space and museum planners. So, we had good people.

They [the Reed administration] kept talking about, “We have this $3.5 million.” We have this great deal that John Levenda had put together with Coca-Cola, a big sponsorship. And that’s why I was folding brochures on the day it opened, because it turned out it wasn’t $3.5 million in cash. It was $3.5 million with pictures of the Civil War Museum on the side of soda cans. It was equivalent advertising, but it wasn’t the cash that everyone thought we were getting to open. So, they’ve always been missing a chunk of money. It was never there when it opened. I think that’s the single greatest downfall.

 

TheBurg: That seems to be a very significant misunderstanding.

Yeah. It’s a shame, but I think the building is solid. We built it to last forever. I don’t know if people know it, but it was one of the first uses of underground ice for cooling. We have ice tanks under the outside parking lots. We make ice during the night and melt it during the day. We had the Smithsonian Institution help us design the exhibit spaces.

One of the things they did, though, and I’m getting is off-topic: After I left and went to the new practice, they came back and chopped up the display space. It was designed exactly to Smithsonian standards for rotating exhibits. They chopped up the first floor and put in a little gallery and a coatroom. And now it was no longer large enough to get the rotating exhibits.

My wife and I have been active. We’ve been 20 years in the city. She was on the HARB board for about 14 or 15 years. She was the chair for a number of years. I’m still on the planning commission, now 18 years, I guess. I’m on the steering committee we’re getting our comprehensive plan consultant selected and getting that all moving, after that debacle. So, it’s good to see it circle back and trying to do it right. At least we have a new zoning code. We brought that to completion three different times. With all the good input, we made it the best it could be, given the resources we had available to us. It always got blocked by real estate people in town, and they would lobby against it. The fact that Eric was able to slide it through at the particular time he was, because we were dealing with a 50-year-old zoning code. So, at least, I feel we did something.

We were trying to find a decent compromise. The goal behind a zoning code is both to protect, but also to encourage future development. And one of the big things that I was very involved in with pushing for was for the riverfront zoning to change. This was all SPD before, and it was very restrictive. Now, opening it up a little bit. We don’t want a bunch of McDonald’s up here, because you can look further up Front Street and see what happened before we had a zoning back in the ‘50s and ‘60s. But we’re starting to see some investment and some things starting to happen on Front Street.

This building is a challenge. We live here, and it’s our office. It’s 26-feet wide. It’s almost 10,000 square feet, but you can’t rent space above the second floor without an elevator. In the historic mode, every floor staggers. So, we can put an elevator in for $300,000, but there’s just not a return. So, we found the sweet spot. I pay my $26,000 a year in property tax and smile. I kind of expect I should have—the racers at least get their decal on the car—Pennzoil and the like. I’d like to see some city people with my logo on them or something. But it’s worked for us, but it’s a strange existence. People look at us and say, “You do what?” Well, yes, we do.

 

TheBurg: So, you fought for this new zoning code for all these years, what do you think that brings to the city?

I think it brings a new place to start the discussion. The old one was so outmoded, it didn’t even represent the society that we have today. At least we have a new basis. At the next planning commission meeting, we have five or six adjustments that people have requested already coming in. At least we can evaluate them based on something that’s remotely valuable. The thing for developers: they have to know what the ground rules are. It just didn’t represent anything that anybody could really get their arms around. The biggest challenge we have right now is this whole parking thing because the way it’s been interpreted and the way it works, it actually gives them the ability to supersede the zoning code. If somebody wanted to come into town at this point, like another Pennsylvania National, these guys have to agree to let you do it even if you want to build your own parking lot. That crosses so many lines. I’m not sure it’s legal, and I think there will be some great challenges some day. But, right now, it’s just another nail in the coffin of development in the city, on a major scale. I don’t think it affects the little guy terribly. But it’s just an erosion; it crosses so many lines. I don’t think that dust has settled.

The thing is: with that whole incinerator deal—there’s not been any discussion over what really went wrong, which is that they had a lawyer’s opinion that said you don’t need bonding. And the company failed at what they did and went bankrupt. I’ve never had a public project that I’ve never had bonding required on, even quasi-public, because you want that insurance. Sure, you pay 2 percent or 3 percent more, but, golly, that would have been the best 3 percent the city ever spent back in the day. And it all just came apart from there.

Steve Reed was a genius—he and Milt Lopus—when they came up with the scheme to do the hydro-dam out here, and then get the Sierra Club to fight them in court for 20 years. And, by the way, it was early enough that you could arbitrage the interest, which you can’t do. They changed the laws after that. That spun off all the money he used to start developing the city: the money for City Island and the money this and that. The stuff he did, even the Hilton—that was that little mayor’s special…. That all really wasn’t city money. It was all creative financing because of the hydro-dam that never went through. People miss that kind of genius, and we need that kind of genius if we’re going to dig out of this hole. That punitive: “You guys are from Harrisburg, you should be punished approach to what we’ve been hit with.”

 

TheBurg: It seems to me that Steve Reed became a bit too confident in his ability to do things.

I think he ran out of energy, became 50 years old. He was 50 years old when the museum opened. It just seemed like, after that, there just wasn’t the drive there had been. If you were here during the ‘90s, before we moved down here, you’d read about Steve Reed atop of the fire truck. He even had an unmarked police car and started doing his own arrests, traffic stops.

 

TheBurg: He seemed to have no distance anymore between Harrisburg and himself and Harrisburg and taxpayer money and himself.

The methods you can argue with. There was a line, and he was always standing on it. The goal, I think, was desirable. I don’t think we’ve ever found any offshore accounts with Steve Reed’s money in it, not like Chicago or some other places around the country. He just had a vision that he wanted to see manifested.

 

TheBurg: It’s fine to have a vision, but you have to be able to afford that vision. You just can’t constantly think, “Oh, I’m going to have some money going in from somewhere” and then start scheming over how to bring that money in.

I thought the recovery plan might have made more sense had we had looked at dissolving the school district and assigning different parts of the city to adjacent school districts like Wilmington did. There’s no Wilmington city school district in Delaware because you reach a point where you can’t deliver when you’ve concentrated things. Of course, that was white flight and everything, long before I was born, they built the Brittany White Bridge to Camp Hill, and that was the end of it.

It’s a weird area because I can see out the window, half the population. But because of that, we have one small Wegman’s. We don’t have one big Wegman’s. We have three Home Depots. You have to duplicate everything because the market is so fragmented. We don’t have any of the more upscale things or more variety like a Trader Joe’s, that kind of stuff. I look at Winston-Salem again: same size town, same demographic. But it’s a county system. You see it down south. Once once you get sewer, once you get water and you want fire protection or whatever it is, they annex you. You become part of the city. So, you can’t move far enough out to not be part of the solution. You have to stay engaged. Here, you drive a mile, you’re in your own world, and we’re left to our own devices on the East Shore.

If I walk out my front door, there are 26 municipalities in a five-mile radius, maybe 24 now that Fairview went away. Pennsylvania is just so fractionalized, and I see that everyplace we go, whether it’s Altoona or Johnstown. We’re doing a lot of work up there with school systems. People, you’ve got limited resources. You need to cooperate. And we don’t have that, and I don’t know how to force it.

 

TheBurg: I don’t know how you do that, because it’s the system is just built that way. Everyone is invested in the status quo, and no one wants to give up what they have.

We see that everywhere we go, all these communities we deal with. It’s frustrating. There’s a great life to be had here, but we have to get out of our own way. I think we’re in a kind of caretaker situation right now with regard to governance. I was never more disappointed to see Council fall back into its old ways, with Eric’s first budget. If he wants a sustainability director, and he can cut three positions and move the money around, why not? What the hell is it going to hurt?

I was in Portland, Ore., spent two weeks there. Trolley cars everywhere and development and people and mixed income levels. You go there, and it’s an architect’s dream. It’s what our zoning codes and all the green design standards and everything—they’re doing it. So, it can be done. If you look at pictures of there in the ‘70s, it was a pretty decrepit place. They had fallen on their face because they lost industry and transportation had changed because they used to barge up the river, and nobody was doing that anymore.

 

TheBurg: They totally remade themselves.

So, it can be done. I even look at Winston with its problems, Winston-Salem. They lost 18,000 jobs with RJR, which basically ran their town. Then, with the tobacco settlement, they said, “We’ll show you. We’re going to make ourselves efficient enough to be able to pay off that big multi-billion-dollar settlement. How do we do that? We ship everything overseas to produce it.” So they fired all the American people and left a hole in the middle of the city.

 

TheBurg: I’ve found, in many cases, the council asserts power because it can.

A plan executed is better than no plan at all because you can always adjust the course. But to sit there doing nothing because it might be the wrong thing or might not be as perfect as some other idea.

From a development standpoint, we tried to make developments work for many different projects in this city. Once LERTA went away, we couldn’t make the numbers work. I looked actually at Stokes Millworks. We had that under contract at one point. But I was looking at $48,000 in taxes the first year it was done. Really? So, now I’m down in Chambersburg. We bought the old Central Junior High School down there, 120,000 square feet, and I have a five-year tax abatement. It’s not great, but it’s something. It’s an historic structure, which is where they put their tax abatement. So, they weren’t talking about building new stuff. But, down there, they’ve been tremendous to work with. It’s a world of difference.

 

TheBurg: What else in Harrisburg have you been involved with?

We did St. Stephen’s, which was one of the first green projects in the area and the region. It won a number of awards. We’ve done some smaller redevelopment things like the AFL headquarters down here next to the Firehouse (restaurant). They cut the budget halfway through, and we had to cancel the new windows. We had them under production. What a shame. The history to that building is just phenomenal. We’ve done things with Volunteers of America. The city was just a very insular culture, and there wasn’t much that happened here. You can look at the list of really what’s happened, other than what WCI has been able to do. Dan Deitchman did some things, but he’s picked up his marbles now and kind of headed to State College. Harrisburg University—we did some very early conception planning for that. We were going to put it in the post office before they decided to go $60 million in the air.

 

TheBurg: Let’s talk about the Capitol View Commerce Center.

I never thought I’d see that. I’d reached the point where I expected to see demolition.

 

TheBurg: I didn’t even know it would be savable, since it was exposed to the elements for years.

If you can buy $9 million of the infrastructure for $250,000, it’s an amazingly cheap deal. I looked at it for a number of different folks, but the problem was you had to have a deep-pocketed person to do it, because no bank was going to finance you. And John [Moran] has millions of square feet of logistics space at 80 and 15 in Berwick and that whole zone.

But, yeah, that was one of the more exciting projects for us because it was a chance to remake 3,200 feet of Cameron Street. That was a brownfield, Harrisburg Steel. The things we had to solve to make it work: poor soils, contamination on the site. There was a nasty treatment plant that we had to rebuild it brand new, which we did, down near the stream. We had to blow the old one up, build a new one, do the EPA and all that fun stuff. Then, of course, they shut down anyhow.

When David Dodd first came up with the idea of the project, it was very entrancing because his model was that he had a printing operation that he had started in the city, moved out to Penbrook and grew it up to 100 employees. It was a pretty good business. So, he wanted a facility expanded, too. We designed it with a rooftop play yard for daycare. It was to be provided on site. The main part of the building was actually a building that was designed by John Vartan. He had actually made the pieces before he died. They were sitting out where Giant is on Linglestown Road. That was his pre-casting plant, and he had a big supply store, Vartan Supply. So, when he died, about the time we were doing this, we knew that nobody was picking up the casting yard or anything like that. But he had built this building to go up near where his son built the facility there. It was to fill a whole block. It was a four-story building with two stories of parking underneath.

 

TheBurg: At 6th Street?

Yeah. So, the pieces in here were actually for the other building. So, we directed David to talk to him and see if we could pick these up on a whim. At the time, they were worried about what to do with all of this pre-cast because they were going to build Giant and the mall in there. So, he paid pennies on the dollar to get it. So, we designed it around these pre-cast T’s, what had been a building that was to be elsewhere in the city. Then David’s concept, and I think it was still valid: What is Harrisburg missing that every other northeastern city has? Old industrial lofts. There just was no incubator space. Well, there are a few trashy little buildings. And there were more, but they all burned down up in Allison Hill in a huge, like 12-alarm fire back in the late ‘70s. We lost a lot of it. So, the idea was to design space that easily could be incubator, very industrial lofty, which is what the high-rise building was. So, that sat over top of over the first floor, and that first floor, where there’s a little bit of a notch, like a porch, was going to be like retail showrooms, like furniture showrooms, because there are 30,000 cars a day that park there. Lit up at night, looking in those windows, you could sell cars, you could sell furniture, do whatever. All the parking was going to be below grade. That’s how we dealt with flood plain.

Now, it’s a little different than what we had visualized. We got a grant from Chesapeake Bay Foundation to do a riparian buffer along the whole length of the site. We were going to restore the stream edge and all that. There was a lot of good stuff happening. David was just always looking for another way to do it, a cheaper way, and the reality was that the building had an 800-pounds-per-square-foot floor load because of these paper rolls for printing, and they were being stacked stories high. And we had muck on the site down to about 17 feet. So, we played around with all kinds of densification systems. We said: Just put the piles in and be done with it. And, after a year, that’s what he did. Had he gone ahead and not fooled around, the building would have been done before the real estate crunch, and I think it would have been a successful project. He got himself in a hole and then started playing cute games with it.

We originally started with a construction manager, and they somehow had a falling out. So, he decided to take on one fellow who was qualified. That guy came down with cancer and was down at Johns Hopkins. So, they said: I’ve got this good guy who runs my printing line. I’m going to put him in charge. And I’ve got this other great idea: I’m just going to hire workers off of the union bench. I’m not going to have contractors anymore. That’s when he started getting into a whole world of trouble. I was actually sitting in a meeting. We were on site once a month to try to answer some questions, and he was late. The sprinkler guy was there; the window guy was there; the HVAC guy was there. And I was $75,000 in the hole because he hadn’t paid me. He came up with all these excuses, like the city wasn’t processing the paperwork and da-da-da-da-da-da. And one guy started talking, and they all realized they were getting the same story, and the whole job shut down the next day. The lights went on. I was right there when the light bulbs went on.

Then we came back and tried to bring the project back to life. There was a developer, White Acres Equities. He was actually one of the people who was vying at one point to privatize the parking system. It was basically money from Hong Kong. It was Jacob Frydman. So, we redesigned the whole thing as an upscale retail and office complex. So, he had been promised a lease from the state. They had a lease out for a major block of space. We had prepared new renderings and reworked the whole thing. All of a sudden, one day, he calls and says, “We’re done.” I said, “Why’s that?” He said that the county commissioners got involved, and they had the lease yanked and assigned to Forum Place. They were upside-down on Forum Place because they had paid like $30 million for a building they should have paid $5 million for.

So, whenever anybody looks at David Dodd and this project, there were some other hands involved in bringing it to where it was. It wasn’t just him. But that never gets talked about.

 

TheBurg: How did your firm get involved to be the architect of this?

We actually knew the surveyor. Dodd had said, “I want to maybe put up a metal building to build a printing plant.” This fellow thought maybe he wanted to do something green, and he knew we had done St. Stephen’s. So, the surveyor called and said, “Do you want to sit down and maybe do some sketches? This guy thinks he wants to do something green.” So, we ended up, one thing led to another, and David spun this story with 13 funding sources from HUD, the state, the feds. He had everyone under the sun. It sounded great. He was a hell of a salesman. I just never visualized that that pre-cast that we helped him buy, he was selling back to himself at full value and putting the money in his pocket. We thought the money was being used to cover a shortfall because it was bad soil, the foundations. We knew it was an expensive building, etc., and it all made sense. We actually had gone to open bid to keep it all legal and open. We had done a full-bid package for the pre-cast. It went out. At the time, the pre-cast was running a 24- to 30-month delay. This was gangbusters in 2006. So, we bid it once and didn’t get any bids. We bid it a second time, we got one bid at like $8 million or some, and it should have been $4 million. We knew that David had the chance to buy this pre-cast, and he got a ruling from the city solicitor. He said, well, if you bid it twice and can’t get anybody to supply on it, then you can self-supply. OK, that makes sense. He paid $1 million for all this pre-cast, and it was worth $4 million. This works. Never thought anything about it. Then I find out there ‘s a shoebox in his closet. But I donated $75,000 to make it a prettier intersection. That’s how I look at it. For me, it was frustrating. For a number of years, I was chair of the DGS Selection Committee. I was appointed by Rendell to select architects and designers. I had to go by there. I reached a point that I would drive out of my way. I just couldn’t look at it.

The thing was—they were so close. They had the roof on, but they had the roof membrane laid over the outside with timbers weighing it down because they figured they’d be back the next day to finish. It was one of those things where they had all the doors in but one. The elevator was sitting there in a crate. Most of the building that they hadn’t put up was lying there in boxes. They got so close. But the other thing that screwed them was the bank at the time. The bank got bought and got bought and got bought about the time this went south, and no one was managing the portfolio. As a result, they should have invested about $350,000 to seal the building, the perimeter, finish the membranes. But, because they didn’t, water got inside. We had mold growth through everything.

Even a year after the building was abandoned, we went in with a couple of people who wanted to look at possibly buying it. We walked through it. And I said, “Wow. Nobody’s touched this.” The lights were on. Nobody had turned the light switch off. But, one day, the bank got this brilliant idea. He had all this printing equipment he had purchased and all this paint and barrels of spackle, machines, etc. “We’re going to have an auction.” Let’s bring the community in, and we’re going to get some money back. So, they brought everybody in and had an auction. They raised something, but not much. So, I’m back three months later with another tenant, and, by then, someone had gone through with chainsaws. Whole floors were covered with confetti. That was when they had gone through the building and stripped all the insulation off the copper wire. There was a $500,000 chiller plant sitting up on the roof. They went in and tore off all of the insides, probably got $100 worth of copper. But they broke open walls to take the plumbing piping out. It had been destroyed. I estimate they destroyed $4 to $5 million worth of value. The bank just had to put a night watchman on for what $50,000 a year for two years. That’s what took it to the really abandoned condition. We had the heat pumps installed throughout the building. All the plumbing was installed, thinking it was going to be done in four months.

You want to talk about anatomy of a disaster? The thing just never wanted to happen. First you get started with it, and David does it to himself with fooling around with the foundations, and it slides into a bad economy. Then you get another developer with pockets to join him—Frydman—and the county commissioners get involved and fool around with the state lease that was available. Then it’s still salvageable, and the bank gets this brilliant idea to have an auction. And they say: “Hey, by the way, why doesn’t everybody in town come in and see what you can steal, because this place is wide open?” Then it just sat there and sat there and sat there. So, when John bought it, we had a model. I called him up, and we gave him the model.

They followed our design to a tee. When I saw it, I said, “Wow.” I’m happy because it’s 230,000 square feet of mixed-use, flexible space. He’s bringing jobs into the city, which it was intended to be. But I don’t know he has much tenancy for the upper buildings. His model was to complete the outside and then wait because it worked financially just to get the warehouses up for what he paid for it.

It’s a design from 10 years ago. I was looking at my files, and the design is from November 2004. It’s like you’re seeing something from the past. Ten years is a long time in design.

 

TheBurg: I was surprised when I found out they could use what had been already constructed. I assumed it would not be savable.

The saving grace for us is that we had those pre-cast T-s, because those same pre-cast T-s are what’s used to build bridges. Bridges sit out in the environment. The Susquehanna River will have eaten the whole city of Harrisburg, and that thing will be standing in the middle in 500 year or 1,000 years, and people will say, “What the hell was that?” It’s just that well anchored and that heavily designed. It’s built. It was just a freak. In normal conditions, it would have been torn down. I’m waiting to see the first helicopter.

 

TheBurg: Some of these projects, like this one and The Millworks, are dependent upon people with very deep pockets to come in and save these buildings.

It’s like the patrons of old, like the Medicis in Florence.

 

TheBurg: In some way, they’re making an uneconomic decision. Sure, they hope for a return, but this is almost a decision outside of sheer economics. It needs people who have another mission that’s not always the bottom line.

And, once upon a time, in our communities in Pennsylvania, banks would support it because they were local. But how many banks now are headquartered in Harrisburg? They’re all part of someone else. There’s nobody here. So, who has the local interest? In some small towns, there are still some small local banks, but not many around the state. Those are the people sitting around saying, “You know, it may not make sense to lend money to that department store. You know, I’ll probably break even on it. But at least I’ll have a department store, and the three buildings on either side of it won’t go empty because it’s there.” Those kinds of decision are lacking because we don’t have locally vested people. You have to have someone who is locally motivated. Then the only person left is government.

 

Continue Reading